VIPIN SANGHI, JASMEET SINGH
Kaushalaya Devi – Appellant
Versus
Delhi Nagrik Sehkari Bank Ltd. – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Vipin Sanghi, J. (Oral)--We have heard learned counsel for the parties at length and proceed to dispose of the present writ petition.
2. The petitioners have preferred the present writ petition to seek the setting aside of the orders dated 15.05.2015 & 28.06.2017 passed by the Delhi Cooperative Tribunal (DCT), Delhi. The petitioners also seek remand of the case back to the learned DCT, Delhi, or before the Sole Arbitrator, who has passed the award dated 24.02.2014 for deciding the amount outstanding/rate of interest for the delayed period, afresh. The petitioners also seek refund of excess amount of Rs.1,11,23,272/- deposited by the petitioners "under protest", for release of their title documents.
3. The background facts are that the respondent/Delhi Nagrik Sehkari Bank Ltd. sanctioned an amount of Rs.3.20 Crores as loan to the petitioners in early October 2009 @ 12.5% per annum. The term of the loan was extended by one year on 28.10.2010. On 31.03.2012, the account was declared as a Non-Performing Asset (NPA) showing an outstanding balance of Rs.3,19,78,753/-. On 18.10.2012, the respondent bank issued a notice under Section 13(2) of the SARFAESI Act for an amount of Rs.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.