SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Del) 1952

DINESH KUMAR SHARMA
Krishna Wadehra – Appellant
Versus
Ram Parsad – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Dinesh Kumar Sharma, J. (Oral)

CM APPL. 29061/2022 (exemption)

Exemption allowed subject to all just exceptions.

CM APPL. 29059/2022 (condonation of delay)

For the reasons stated in the application, the delay for one day in filing the petition is condoned.

The application stands disposed of.

C.R.P. 86/2022, CM APPL. 29060/2022 (stay)

1. The present revision petition has been filed challenging the impugned order dated 20th February, 2020, whereby the application under Order VII Rule 11 CPC has been dismissed by the learned Trial Court. Predominantly on the ground that the certified copy of sale deed dated 28th August, 1968, produced by the learned counsel for the defendant to prove his title, neither bears the signatures of vendor nor of the witnesses.

2. Learned senior counsel has submitted that the suit being filed by the respondent/plaintiff bearing No. CS 341 of 2019 against the petitioners/defendants is an abuse of the process of the Court. Learned senior counsel submits that it is an admitted case that the defendants/petitioners are in possession of the suit property bearing House No. 12, Block-D, Satyawati Nagar/Colony, New Delhi-110052.

3. Learned senior counsel has sub

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top