SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Del) 2074

C. HARI SHANKAR
Surinder Kaur – Appellant
Versus
Prabhat Kumar Sahu – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Satinder Singh and Robin Bansal, Advs., for the Petitioners.

JUDGMENT (ORAL)

C. Hari Shankar, J.

1. This petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India assails order dated 5th April 2022, whereby the learned Additional Senior Civil Judge ("the learned ASCJ") has allowed an application under Order VI Rule 17 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) preferred by the respondent, as the plaintiff in the said suit.

2. A brief factual recital would be apposite.

3. CS 11012/2016, filed by the respondent against the petitioners, sought a restraint against the petitioners from dispossessing the respondent from the suit property located at WZ-75/3, Plot No. 87, Killa No.22, Sant Garh, Major Bhupinder Singh Nagar, New Delhi ("the suit property") and from demolishing the existing structure or making any other construction in its place.

4. On the ground that, despite an order of stay having been passed in CS 11012/2016, on 24th December 2010, restraining any construction being unauthorised construction from coming up on the suit property, the defendant in the suit was carrying out unauthorized construction thereon, the respondent filed an application under Section 343 of the Delhi Municipal Corporation Act, 1957. The learned ASCJ, on the sa

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top