NIKHIL S. KARIEL
Natubhai Golanbhai Khuman – Appellant
Versus
Sintex Power Company Ltd. – Respondent
ORDER :
1. Since both the petitions arise from similar orders, whereby application for amending the plaint has been rejected and whereas the dispute raised in the Civil Suit being similar in nature and whereas even the amendment sought for is identical, therefore, this Court deems it appropriate, more particularly, with the consent of parties, to take both these applications for hearing together.
2. Heard learned advocate Mr. Pratik Jasani for the applicant, learned advocate Mr. Darshan M. Parikh on behalf of the respondent.
3. By way of these applications, the applicants-original plaintiffs challenge an order passed by the learned Principal Senior Civil Judge, Amreli dated 21.08.2017 below Exhibit-40 & 37 in Special Civil Suit No.75 of 2013 and Special Civil Suit No.74 of 2013 respectively. Learned advocate Mr. Jasani on behalf of the petitioner would submit that the petitioner-original plaintiff had preferred Special Civil Suit No.75 of 2013 and Special Civil Suit No.74 of 2013 inter-alia challenging a registered sale deed entered into between the original plaintiff and the defendant i.e. the parties before the Court. Learned advocate would submit that in the Civil Suit, the origina
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.