SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Del) 2081

SUDHIR KUMAR JAIN
Kiran Taneja – Appellant
Versus
State (GNCT of Delhi) – Respondent


JUDGMENT

1. This judgment shall decide present petition under section 482 code of criminal code of criminal procedure, 1973 (hereinafter referred as "the Code") for quashing of proceeding and setting aside the orders dated 27.1.2018, 19.10.2019 and 08.11.2019 passed by the court of Shri Sanjay Khangwal, ASJ, Special Judge, ACB Delhi in CC bearing no. 55/17 (332/2019) and application bearing no. 2069/2020 filed by the applicant Vijay Gautam for impleadment.

2. The factual background necessary to mention is that Satya Devi Gautam was the recorded owner of the property bearing no. D-79, Panchsheel Enclave, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as "the property"). Satya Devi Gautam expired on 25.01.2011 and thereafter Ravi Dutt Gautam became the recorded owner of the property who expired on 28.04.2011 without leaving any legal heirs. Thereafter, Renu Joshi r/o D-15, Indra Enclave, Sainik Farm, New Delhi claimed that the property has been bequeathed to her by virtue of Will stated to be executed in her favour by Ravi Dutt Gautam wherein she was mentioned as sole beneficiary.

2.1. Parmil Mittal (hereinafter referred to as "the complainant") made a complaint in larger public interest to th

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top