SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Del) 1996

VIBHU BAKHRU, AMIT MAHAJAN
K. R. Anand – Appellant
Versus
Navayuga Engineering Co. Ltd. – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Vibhu Bakhru, J.

1. The appellant has filed the present appeal under Section 37(1)(c) of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereafter `the A&C Act') impugning an order dated 27.11.2018 (hereafter `the impugned order') passed by the learned Single Judge rejecting the appellant's petition [being OMP(COMM) No.27/2018 captioned Shri K.R. Anand v. Navayuga Engineering Co. Ltd. The appellant had filed the said petition under Section 34 of the A&C Act seeking to set aside an arbitral award dated 16.11.2017 (hereafter `the impugned award').

2. The impugned award was rendered in the context of disputes that have arisen between the parties in connection with the Sub Contract Agreement dated 10.12.2004.

Factual Context:

3. In the year 2004-05, the respondent was awarded a contract bearing no. 10/EE-I/PF P/2004-05 relating to construction of a bridge across river Yamuna near Geeta Colony, Delhi by the Public Works Department, Delhi (hereafter the `PWD').

4. Thereafter, on 10.12.2004, the respondent sub-contracted a part of the works, as contained in Section II of the Bill of Quantities, to the appellant in terms of the Sub Contract Agreement (hereafter `the Agreement'). The c

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top