SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Del) 2005

NAVIN CHAWLA
Starbucks Corporation – Appellant
Versus
Lol Café – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Navin Chawla, J.

1. This suit has been filed by the plaintiff inter-alia praying for a decree of permanent injunction restraining the defendants from infringing and/or passing off the plaintiff's registered trade mark `FRAPPUCCINO' and/or using the `FRAPPUCCINO' mark, including the `BROWNIE Chips FRAPPUCCINO' or any other similar trade mark in relation to their goods and services. The plaintiff also prays for damages; rendition of accounts of profits illegally earned by the defendants; and for an order of delivery and handing over of all the impugned goods, menu cards, and all other goods of any nature bearing and/or containing the impugned mark `FRAPPUCCINO' in any manner whatsoever, to the plaintiff for their destruction.

2. Vide order dated 23.08.2019 of this Court, summons in the Suit were issued to the defendants and an ex-parte ad-interim injunction was granted in favour of the plaintiff, restraining the defendants from using `FRAPPUCCINO' mark in any manner on any of the products sold by them.

3. In spite of service of summons, the defendants chose not to appear or file their written statements and were thus proceeded ex-parte on 28.11.2019. The plaintiff was give

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top