NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA
Nilofar Singh – Appellant
Versus
Pramod Dang – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Neena Bansal Krishna, J.
I.A. 16344/2018
1. An application under Order I Rule 10 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 has been filed on behalf of the Plaintiff for impleadment of Mr. O.P Manchanda as defendant no. 3.
2. It is submitted in the application that the Plaintiff has filed a suit for Declaration, Cancellation of documents, Possession, Permanent and Mandatory Injunction against defendant nos. 1 and 2 in respect of the Suit Property bearing House No. 106-C/B, Sainik Farms, Khanpur, New Delhi.
3. It is submitted in the application that Defendant no. 1 in its Written Statement dated 1st April, 2013 had stated that the suit property is in possession of one Mr. O.P. Manchanda, resident of 169, Kariyappa Marg, Sainik Farms, New Delhi-110062 in whose favor the documents of Title have been executed by the Plaintiff. It is claimed that although precise details of the alleged Title documents executed in favour of Mr. O. P Manchanda which are in fact forged and fabricated, were mentioned along with the payment details and bank drafts but deliberately the documents were not filed on record.
4. The Plaintiff moved an Interlocutory application vide I.A. NO. 2488/2015 seeking
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.