SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Del) 2028

VIBHU BAKHRU, AMIT MAHAJAN
Chandra Kishore Chaurasia – Appellant
Versus
R. A. Perfumery Works Private Ltd. – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Vibhu Bakhru, J.

1. The appellant (plaintiff) has filed the present appeal impugning an order dated 05.08.2021 (hereafter `the impugned order'), passed by the learned District Judge, Commercial Court-II, Shahdara, Karkardooma Courts, Delhi (hereafter `the Commercial Court') in CS(COMM) No.132/2021, whereby the respondent's application under Order VII Rule 11 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (hereafter `the CPC') was allowed and the plaint filed by the appellant was directed to be returned. The learned Commercial Court, on a reading of the plaint along with its documents, found that the appellant had failed to establish a prima facie case in respect of the territorial jurisdiction of the Court.

2. The respondent (defendant) had also sought dismissal of the suit under Order VII Rule 11(d) of the CPC on the ground that the appellant had instituted the said suit without complying with the mandatory provisions of pre-institution mediation under Section 12A of the Commercial Courts Act, 2015. The Commercial Court did not accept the said contention as the appellant had sought urgent relief. Accordingly, the said prayer of the respondent was rejected. The respondent has pref

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top