SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Del) 368

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
AMIT SHARMA, J.
Raj Kumar – Petitioner
Versus
The State, National Capital Territory Of Delhi - Respondent
Bail Appln. No.3895 Of 2022
Decided On : 14-03-2023

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mr. Jitender Gupta, Mr. Deepak Rohilla & Mr. Amit Yadav.
For the Respondent: Mr. Aman Usman with SI Narender Kr., P.S. Ranhola.

The court considered contradictory statements, lack of material evidence, and the filing of the chargesheet in granting bail to the applicant.

Headnote:

BAIL - Criminal Law - CrPC 439, IPC 307/498A/34 - The court granted bail to the applicant under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 in a case registered under Sections 307/498A/34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860. The court considered the contradictory statements of the complainant and an eye witness, lack of material to substantiate the prosecution's plea, and the filing of the chargesheet in reaching its decision.

Fact of the Case:

The complainant alleged that she was pushed from the terrace by the applicant and other accused persons. However, an eye witness initially stated that the complainant jumped from the roof, and later retracted her statement. The chargesheet was filed, and the applicant had been in judicial custody since the incident.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that there was a contradictory eye witness account, lack of material to substantiate the prosecution's plea regarding threat and evidence tampering, and the filing of the chargesheet. It concluded that keeping the applicant in judicial custody would serve no useful purpose.

Issues: Contradictory statements of the complainant and an eye witness, lack of material to substantiate the prosecution's plea, and the filing of the chargesheet.

Ratio Decidendi: The court considered the contradictory statements, lack of material evidence, and the filing of the chargesheet in granting bail to the applicant.

Final Decision: The court allowed the application and admitted the applicant to bail upon furnishing a personal bond and surety, subject to specific terms and conditions.

JUDGMENT :

[Amit Sharma, J.]

1. The present application under Section 439 read with Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (‘CrPC’) by the petitioner/applicant seeks grant of regular bail in FIR No. 512/2022 under Sections 307/498A/34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (‘IPC’), registered at PS Ranhola, New Delhi.

2. Briefly stated, the facts relevant for adjudication of the present application are as under:

    i. On 21.06.2022, a PCR call was received at PS Ranhola, Delhi regarding a lady (complainant) having fell from the roof of her matrimonial house. Subsequently, the complainant was referred to Rathi Hospital for necessary treatment.

ii. On reaching the hospital and subsequent enquiries, it was revealed that the nature of injuries were grievous and the injured had been married for less than seven years, hence SDM Punjabi Bagh was informed about the same. Upon receipt of the said information, the SDM Punjabi Bagh reached the hospital and recorded the statement of the victim.

iii. On 23.06.2022, the victim, in her statement alleged that she had married Mr. Ram Kumar 6-7 months prior to the date of the present incident and at the time of her matrimonial alliance, Rs. 2.5 lakhs were paid as dowry. It is further alleged in the statement that after her marriage, she was taunted, beaten and threatened for dowry as well as restrained from communicating and or meeting with her parents and husband. The victim has alleged that on 21.06.2022, by reason of her request to meet her mother, the present applicant, Mr. Raj Kumar Singh (brother-in law) along with other accused persons namely, Nempal Singh (father-in law), Mamta (mother-in law), & Monica (sister-in law) dragged her to the terrace and pushed her from there.

iv. Consequently, FIR 512/2022 under Sections 307/498A/34 of IPC was registered.

v. On 24.06.2022, the present applicant along with co-accused, Nempal Singh were arrested and sent to judicial custody.

vi. During the course of investigation, the statement of an eye witness i.e. the neighbor of the applicant/accused, Ms. Babita was recorded, who stated that the complainant herself jumped from the roof. However, during further course of investigation, the said eye witness retracted from her previous statement, by reason of which her statement was again recorded under Section 164 of CrPC, wherein she stated that the complainant was hanging from the roof and by reason of subsequent loosening of grip, she fell down.

vii. During the investigation, Call Detail Records were obtained & analyzed as well as a supplementary statement of the complainant was also recorded under Section 161 of CrPC. In her additional statement, the complainant admitted to having communicated with her mother, brother and husband through the phone of the present applicant and his wife. She stated that her relatives, Kamal @ Kamlesh and his wife, Hira Devi visited her matrimonial house wherein they witnessed her being abused & misbehaved with at the hands of the present applicant and his family. She further stated that subsequent to Kamal @ Kamlesh conveying to her in-laws that the complainant’s father shall come and take her from her matrimonial home, the present applicant along with the other co-accused persons dragged her to the terrace and threw her from there.

viii. It was also stated that the complainant had thrown three handwritten slips to a person named Kamal @ Kamlesh requesting him to save her from her in-laws on 21.06.2022. The aforesaid Kamal @ Kamlesh was also examined, who stated that the alleged three slips were handed over by him to the Investigating Officer.

ix. After the completion of investigation, chargesheet was filed before the Court of competent jurisdiction. Vide order dated 29.08.2022, the learned Additional Sessions Judge-05, Tis Hazari Courts dismissed the first bail application filed by the present applicant and co-accused, Nempal Singh. Vide order dated 30.11.2022, learned Additional Sessions Judge-09, Tis Hazari Courts dism

    Click Here to Read the rest of this document
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10
    11
    SupremeToday Portrait Ad
    supreme today icon
    logo-black

    An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

    Please visit our Training & Support
    Center or Contact Us for assistance

    qr

    Scan Me!

    India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

    For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

    whatsapp-icon Back to top