SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Raj) 2734

MANOJ KUMAR GARG
Bada Ram – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Sumitra Singaria, Advocate, S.K. Mehar, Advocate

JUDGMENT

Manoj Kumar Garg, J. - The present bail application has been filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. The petitioner has been arrested in connection with FIR No.418/2021 of Police Station Pindwara, District Sirohi for the offence punishable under Sections 498A, 304-B of IPC.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that so far nineteen (19) prosecution witnesses have been examined before the trial Court and there are material contradictions, improvements and omissions in their statements. Counsel further submits that no specific allegation of demanding dowry has been levelled against the present petitioner. The petitioner is in the judicial custody and the trial of the case will take sufficiently long time. Therefore, the benefit of bail should be granted to the accused-petitioner.

3. Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the prayer for bail.

4. I have considered the arguments advanced before me and carefully gone through the record.

5. According to the FIR, incident took place within the two months of the marriage of the present petitioner and deceased. It is also mentioned that the present petitioner harrassed the deceased and he also used to beat her due to which Smt. Badki died

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top