Back
C. HARI SHANKAR
Cable News Network INC – Appellant
Versus
CTVN Calcutta Television Network Pvt. Ltd. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. decision on applications filed under cpc (Para 1) |
| 2. plaintiff's corporate details and trademarks (Para 2 , 3 , 5) |
| 3. notice and responses between parties (Para 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 4. allegations of infringement and rivalry (Para 10 , 11 , 12 , 13) |
| 5. interlocutory injunction requirements (Para 14 , 15 , 16) |
| 6. legal considerations for territorial jurisdiction (Para 17 , 18 , 19) |
| 7. debates on jurisdiction and accessibility (Para 20 , 21 , 22 , 23) |
| 8. arguments concerning defendant's business practices (Para 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28) |
| 9. counterarguments from defendant's counsel (Para 29 , 30) |
| 10. judicial examination of jurisdiction under cpc (Para 31 , 32 , 33 , 34) |
| 11. clarifications on jurisdictional boundaries (Para 35 , 36) |
| 12. court's viewpoint on infringement standards (Para 37 , 38 , 39) |
| 13. final injunction against the defendant (Para 124 , 135) |
JUDGMENT :
C. HARI SHANKAR, J.
1. By this judgment, I proceed to decide IA 7844/2021, preferred by the plaintiff against the defendant under Order XXXIX Rules 1 and 2 of the CIVIL PROCEDURE CODE , 1908 (CPC), seeking interlocutory injunctive reliefs and IA 9228/2021, by the defendant against the plaintiff under Order VII Rule 10 of the C
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
