IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
TUSHAR RAO GEDELA, J.
Bimla Kapoor and Others – Appellants
Versus
Sangita Bhutani and Another - Respondent
CM(M) 630 of 2023
Decided on : 20-04-2023
Exemption - Application for exemption from filing entire Trial Court record - Order under Order 1 Rule 10 r/w Section 151 of CPC, 1908 - Suit filed against deceased defendant - Permission to file a fresh suit with LR's of deceased defendant
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner challenged the order allowing the application under Order 1 Rule 10 r/w Section 151 of CPC, 1908, filed on behalf of the respondent/plaintiff, seeking permission to implead the petitioner as defendant to the suit filed against a deceased defendant.
Finding of the Court:
The court permitted the respondent/plaintiff to withdraw the present suit with liberty to file a properly constituted suit in accordance with law, considering the fact that the suit was filed for eviction and recovery of possession of the subject suit premises.
Issues: The main issue was whether the suit filed against a deceased defendant could be maintained and whether the application under Order 1 Rule 10 of CPC, 1908 could cure the defect by allowing the impleadment of the petitioner as defendant.
Ratio Decidendi: The court found that the suit against a deceased defendant was not maintainable and allowed the respondent/plaintiff to withdraw the suit with liberty to file a properly constituted suit in accordance with law.
Final Decision: The petition was disposed of, allowing the respondent/plaintiff to withdraw the present suit with liberty to file a properly constituted suit in accordance with law.
JUDGMENT :
Tushar Rao Gedela, J.
CM APPL. 19597/2023
1. Exemption is allowed, subject to all just exceptions
2. The application stands disposed of.
CM APPL. 19598/2023
3. This is an application seeking exemption from filing entire Trial Court record.
4. This court does not require the same as of now, accordingly the application stands allowed.
5. Application stands disposed of.
CM(M) 630/2023 & CM APPL. 19596/2023
6. The petitioner challenges the order dated 04.03.2023. in CS No. 328/2021 titled as “Sangita Bhutani v. Surender Kapoor” whereby the application under Order 1 Rule 10 r/w Section 151 of CPC, 1908 filed on behalf of respondent/plaintiff was allowed.
7. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the suit admittedly was filed against the sole deceased/defendant late Sh. Surender Kapoor, who was their father.
8. Accordingly, Mr. Singh, learned counsel for respondent submits that the suit against a dead person is not maintainable.
9. Learned counsel submits that by way of an application under Order 1 Rule 10 of CPC, 1908, the defect could not have been cured and the LRs of the said deceased/defendant could not have been impleaded or substituted as an independent defendant since the suit filed against a dead person itself is not maintainable and is a nullity in law.
10. On the aforesaid basis, learned counsel submits that the impugned order, as such, is unsustainable in law and ought to be set aside.
11. Per contra, learned counsel appearing for the respondent/plaintiff submits that the factum of the death of the sole defendant was revealed to the respondent after having filed the suit and it was on that basis that the application under Order 1 Rule 10 of CPC, 1908 was filed seeking permission of the court to implead the petitioner as defendant to the said suit.
12. Learned counsel appearing for the respective parties have filed judgments in their favour.
13. After some arguments, learned counsel for the respondent/plaintiff submits that the respondent/plaintiff be permitted to file a fresh suit arraying the LR's of the sole deceased defendant as parties to such suit.
14. In view of the submissions of learned counsel appearing for the respondent/plaintiff, this court deems it fit as also in the facts and the circumstances of the case and keeping in view the fact that the suit was filed for the eviction and recovery of the possession of the subject suit premises, to permit the respondent/plaintiff to withdraw the present suit with liberty to file a properly constituted suit in accordance with law.
15. Petition is disposed of in view of the above terms, with no order as to costs.
The legal principle established is that a suit filed against a deceased defendant is not maintainable, and the court may permit the withdrawal of the suit with liberty to file a properly constituted ....
A suit filed against a dead person is a nullity and cannot be subsequently amended to substitute the legal representatives of the deceased defendant.
A suit filed against a deceased person is a nullity, but if it involves multiple parties, it may not abate; procedural lapses can be corrected to serve substantial justice.
The provisions of Order XXII Rule 4, CPC do not apply to a person who has expired 14 years prior to the filing of the suit.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the court's power to treat an application under Order 22 Rule 4 of CPC as an application under Order 1 Rule 10 of CPC, allowing for the substitutio....
An appeal filed against a deceased sole defendant is a nullity; proper procedure requires withdrawal of the appeal with liberty to file a fresh one involving the legal heirs.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.