SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(P&H) 586

HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI
Surinderjeet @ Surender Kumar – Appellant
Versus
Krishna – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Mr. Sanjiv Kumar Aggarwal, Advocate, for the Petitioner

JUDGMENT

Harsimran Singh Sethi J. (Oral) - Present civil revision has been filed challenging the order dated 11.01.2023 (Annexure P-1) passed by the trial Court by which the application filed under Order 7 Rule 11 of the CPC moved by petitionerdefendant No.5 has been dismissed.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner argues that the suit was filed by the respondent-plaintiff by impleading defendant No.2 who had already died on 23.10.2022 much before the filing of the suit in question and therefore, as no suit is maintainable against a dead person, the present suit is liable to be rejected even against the other defendants also who were very much alive and had been served.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the application filed by the petitioner-defendant No.5 under Order 7 Rule 11 of the CPC has wrongly been rejected by the Court below. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that keeping in view the settled principle of law settled by the Coordinate Bench of this Court in CR No.7685 of 2009 titled as Nachhattar Singh vs. Darshan Singh and others, decided on 03.08.2010, the suit filed against the dead person is not maintainable and the said suit could only ha

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top