SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Del) 2139

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Prathiba M. Singh, J.
Isan Corporation - Petitioner
Versus
National Highways Authority of India - Respondent
W.P.(C) 15985 of 2022, 13467, 18050 of 2023, W.P.(C) 15986 of 2022, 13273, 17991 of 2023, W.P.(C) 14882 of 2022 and CM APPL. 45746 of 2022, 4295 of 2023
Decided On : 13-04-2023

Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner:Mr. Rahul Sagar Sahay, Mr. Raghav Rajmalani, Advocates.
For the Respondent:Ms. Pooja Singh, Advocate

The judgment establishes the principle that the NHAI's penalty actions, including debarment, should be proportional and in line with the NHAI's policy on penalty actions.

Headnote:

NHAI - Tender for Consultancy Services - Bharat Mala Project - NHAI/PC/1 - The judgment discusses the deficiencies in the tender documents submitted by the Petitioners, the show cause notice issued by NHAI, and the subsequent debarment of the Petitioners. The court analyzes the deficiencies, the NHAI's policy on penalty actions, and the proportionality of the debarment.

Fact of the Case:

The NHAI floated a tender for consultancy services under the Bharat Mala Project. The Petitioners, a consortium, were declared successful bidders and entered into a Consultant's Contract Agreement with NHAI. The Petitioners faced issues with the submission of the Detailed Project Report (DPR) and were subsequently debarred by NHAI.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that there were deficiencies in the tender documents submitted by the Petitioners, and the NHAI's show cause notice and subsequent debarment were not arbitrary or perverse. The court also noted that the matter should be resolved through the dispute resolution clause in the contract.

Issues: The main issues revolved around the deficiencies in the tender documents, the NHAI's show cause notice, and the debarment of the Petitioners.

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the deficiencies and the NHAI's actions were not suitable for review in writ jurisdiction and should be resolved through the dispute resolution clause. The court also considered the proportionality of the debarment based on the NHAI's policy on penalty actions.

Final Decision: The court directed that the debarment of Isan Korea should be restricted to the period already elapsed, allowing them to bid in future contracts. However, the debarment of Isan India and the consortium member Specialised was upheld, and the parties were relegated to the disputes resolution clause.

JUDGMENT :

PRATHIBA M. SINGH, J.

This hearing has been done through hybrid mode.

2. The NHAI floated a tender as a part of the Bharat Mala Project under the Bharat Mala Scheme for engaging entities to provide consultancy services, for the preparation of the ‘Detailed Project Report’ (DPR).

3. The Petitioners-Isan Corporation India Pvt. Ltd. (‘Isan India’) and Specialized Engineering Services Pvt. Ltd., (‘Specialised’) which had formed a consortium, had submitted their bid and were declared successful bidders. Pursuant to this, a ‘Consultant's Contract Agreement’ (hereinafter ‘the agreement’) dated 11th May, 2017 was entered into between the Petitioner-consortium and NHAI. The said agreement described the project as under:

    “CONSULTANCY SERVICES FOR PROJECT PREPARATION OF FEASIBILITY STUDY/DETAILED PROJECT REPORT OF SELECTED PORT CONNECTIVITY ROAD STRETCHES/CORRIDORS FOR UP GRADATION TO TWO/FOUR LANE NH CONFIGURATION UNDER BHARAT MALA SCHEME. (1) UPGRADING OF EXISTING DEDICATED PORT CONNECTIVITY FROM KRISHNAPATNAM PORT NH-5 IN SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH (II) DEVELOPMENT OF 5KM LONG GREEN FIELD ROAD CONNECTING SOUTH AND NORTH INDUSTRIAL CLUSTER OF KHANDALERU CREEK NEAR KRISHNAPATNAM PORT (III) UPGRADING OF EXISTING R&B ROAD FROM NEAR KRISHNAPATNAM PORT IN SPSR DISTRICT NELLORE (TOTAL LENGTH - 55 KMS) IN THE STATES OF ANDHRA PRADESH UNDER - CONTRACT PACKAGE NO. NHAI/PC/1”

4. In terms of the contract, various deadlines were fixed for submission of the report. The said deadlines are explained in the form of days from the date of the contract at page 411 of the counter affidavit of NHAI in WP (C) 15986/2022. The same are set out below—

Schedule for submission of Reports and Documents

Stage No.

Activity

No. of copies

 

 

Category-I Packages

Category-II Packages

1.

Monthly Reports

3

by 10th day of every month

by 10th day of month

2.

Inception Report

(i) Draft Inception Report including QAP document

3

21

21

(ii) Inception Report including QAP document

3

30

30

3.

F.S. REPORT

 

(i) Draft Feasibility Study Report including option study report

4

90

45

(ii) Comments of client

1

105

60

(iii) Final Feasibility Study Report incorporating Compliance of comments of Client.

4

120

75

4.

Technical Schedules for EPC/PPP Projects

4

130

90

5.

Detailed Project Report

 

(i) Draft DPR

4

150

90

(ii) Comments of client

4

165

105

(iii) Final DPR incorporating compliance of comments of Client

6

180

120

6.

Project clearances from concerned agencies e.g. from MOEF; Rly for approval of GAD and detail engineering drawing of ROB/RUB; Irrigation Dpt.,

Land Acquisitioins-3(a), 3(A), 3(D) Notifications

Original letters from the concerned agencies and 5 photocopies of each

 

3 copies each

210

150

5. The consortium had to make site visits, conduct topographic surveys and commence work for preparation of the report. The final deadline was 210 days for the submission of the DPR. The writ petitions have exhaustively set out the details of the correspondence between the consortium and the NHAI. It is not in doubt that a draft feasibility report was, for the first time, submitted in February, 2018. However, in view of the urgency involved in the matter, the NHAI appears to have requested the Petitioner-consortium for the submission of the tender documents. The Petitioner submitted the tender documents consisting of the format, template, etc. which were to be part of the DPR, on 21st December, 2017. The tender was floated on 28th December, 2017, however, the draft report was given for the first time in February, 2018. In the meantime, the DPR preparation cont

        Click Here to Read the rest of this document
        1
        2
        3
        4
        5
        6
        7
        8
        9
        10
        11
        SupremeToday Portrait Ad
        supreme today icon
        logo-black

        An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

        Please visit our Training & Support
        Center or Contact Us for assistance

        qr

        Scan Me!

        India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

        For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

        whatsapp-icon Back to top