AMIT BANSAL
Amit Jain – Appellant
Versus
Canara Bank – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
AMIT BANSAL, J.
I.A. No. 15745/2022 (O-XXXIX R-1 & 2 of CPC) and I.A. No. 16168/2022 (of the defendant no. 1 u/O-XXXIX R-4 of CPC)
1. Brief facts relevant for deciding the present applications are set out below:
1.2 The defendant bank extended a cash credit facility to the defendant no. 2 company, for which the plaintiff pledged 30% promoters’ holding in the defendant no. 2 company with the defendant bank, and also assigned LIC policies bearing No. 115836269 and 115836270 in the name of the plaintiff to the defendant bank. A share pledge agreement dated 7th July, 2021 was executed by the plaintiff in favour of the defendant bank pledging 19,79,549 equity shares of the defendant no. 2 company with the defendant bank.
1.3 Business of the defendant no. 2 company was hit during COVID-19 Pandemic and meetings were held with the defendant bank for restructuring of the cash credit facility. The cash credit facility of the defendant no. 2 company was declared as a non-performing asset (NPA) by the defendant bank on 18th October, 2021, and on 20th October, 2021, the defendant bank sent a loan recall
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.