IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Vikas Mahajan, J.
Maharaja Agrasen Institute of Technology (Mait) - Petitioner
Versus
Govt of NCT Delhi and Ors - Respondents
W.P.(C) 16871/2022
Decided On : 13-12-2022
Article 19(1)(g) - Admission Procedure - [W.P.(C) 16871/2022 & CM APPL. 53436/2022] - [Article 19(1)(g) of the Constitution of India, Rule 12(8)(a) of Madhya Pradesh Chikitsa Shiksha Pravesh Niyam, 2018] - The court discussed the notification F.No.IPU-7/Online Counselling/2022/3118 dated 06.12.2022 and the decision of the Supreme Court in Index Medical College, Hospital and Research Centre Vs. The State of Madhya Pradesh & Ors., 2021(4) Scale 184. The court analyzed the right of an institution under Article 19(1)(g) to admit students and the impact of the admission procedure on the financial loss to educational institutions. The court also examined the criterion laid down by the university to ensure admissions are done strictly in accordance with merit.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner, an institute affiliated to Guru Gobind Singh Indraprastha University, challenged the notification regarding the commencement of Centralized Online Registration for Special Round of Offline Counseling for Admission to various programs for the academic session 2022-23.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the impugned notification did not violate Article 19(1)(g) of the Constitution of India as it ensured admissions were made strictly in accordance with merit.
Issues: The issues involved the right of an institution to admit students, financial loss to educational institutions, and the impact of the admission procedure on the freedom to run educational institutions.
Ratio Decidendi: The court's decision was based on the interpretation of Article 19(1)(g) and the examination of the notification and relevant legal provisions.
Final Decision: The court refused to grant any interim relief to the petitioner and listed the case for further hearing on 6th February, 2023.
JUDGMENT :
Vikas Mahajan, J.
CM APPL. 53435/2022 (exemption)
1. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.
2. The application stands disposed of.
W.P.(C) 16871/2022 & CM APPL. 53436/2022(for stay)
3. Issue notice.
4. Ms. Ayushi Bansal, learned counsel appearing for respondent nos. 1 (Govt. of NCT of Delhi) and 4 (Directorate of Higher Education) and Ms. Anita Sahani, learned counsel appearing for respondent no.2 (Guru Gobind Singh Indraprastha University) respectively, accept notice.
5. Counter affidavits be filed within four weeks from today.
6. Rejoinder thereto, if any, be filed within two weeks thereafter.
7. Notice be issued to respondent no.3 (All India Council for Technical Education) through all modes.
8. The petitioner is an institute affiliated to the respondent no.2/Guru Gobind Singh Indraprastha University and is aggrieved by the notification F.No.IPU-7/Online Counselling/2022/3118 dated 06.12.2022 whereby process of commencement for Centralized Online Registration for Special Round of Offline Counseling for Admission to various programmes for the academic session 2022-23 to be conducted in the University Campus, was notified.
9. The learned counsel for the petitioner invites the attention of the Court to Clause 7 of the aforesaid notification to contend that the respondent/university has adopted a wrong procedure of counseling by sticking to cut-off ranks of the earlier rounds of Online Counseling of the respective colleges. The said Clause 7 of the notification reads as under:-
10. He further submits that such an action of the respondent/university in not allowing all the students to participate in the Special Round of Offline Counseling despite the petitioner/college having numerous vacant seats in various streams/branches of different programmes, is arbitrary and violative of the Article 19(1)(g) of the Constitution of India.
11. The learned counsel for the petitioner relies upon the decision of the Supreme Court in Index Medical College, Hospital and Research Centre Vs. The State of Madhya Pradesh & Ors., 2021(4) Scale 184, to contend that it is the right of an institution under Article 19(1)(g) of the Constitution of India to admit students and in case the seats under various programmes remain vacant it results into huge financial loss to the educational institutions like petitioner. Reference was made to paragraphs 5 and 25 of the said judgment which read as under:-
“(8)(a) The vacant seats as a result of allotted candidates from MOP-UP round not taking admission or candidates resigning from admitted seat shall not be included in the college level counseling (CLC) being conducted after MOP-UP round”.
25. the right to admit students which is a part of the management's right to occupation under Article 19(1)(g) of the Constitution of In
Index Medical College, Hospital and Research Centre Vs. The State of Madhya Pradesh & Ors.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the admission procedure must ensure admissions are done strictly in accordance with merit, and the freedom to run educational institutions is ....
The court upheld that while institutions possess the right to admit students, there is no entitlement to fill all available seats, emphasizing merit-based admissions per regulatory guidelines.
The issuance of Notice No. 10 dated 26-9-2023 by respondent No. 4 was in violation of the rules and regulations of the NMC Act, and the communication/order dated 18-10-2023 by respondent No. 2 was ju....
The court upheld that an upgrade in seat allocation excludes candidates from participating in subsequent admission rounds, aligning with the established university admission policy.
The court emphasized the application of Rule 12 (8) (ka) of the M.P. Medical Education (Admission) Rules, 2018, which governs the inclusion of vacant seats in subsequent rounds of counselling.
Candidates not domiciled in Uttar Pradesh must meet higher cut-off marks for Unreserved/Open category to qualify for counselling, regardless of their reservation status in their home state.
The right to establish a nursing institution does not guarantee student allotment after the statutory admissions process has concluded, emphasizing strict adherence to timelines for counseling.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.