SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Del) 4418

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Purushaindra Kumar Kaurav, J.
Vivekananda Institute of Professional Studies-technical Campus – Appellant
Versus
Govt. of NCT of Delhi Department of Law, Justice & Legislative Affairs), Through Its Secretary – Respondent
W.P.(C) 14677 of 2022 & CM APPLs. 44985 of 2022, 45790 of 2022, 45791 of 2022, 56595 of 2022, 56596 of 2022 & CM APPL. 4910 of 2023, W.P.(C) 14678 of 2022 & CM APPLs. 44987 of 2022, 45794 of 2022 & CM APPL. 45795 of 2022, W.P.(C) 14679 of 2022 & CM APPLs. 44989 of 2022, 45788 of 2022, 45789 of 2022, 56560 of 2022, 56561 of 2022 & 4860 of 2023, W.P.(C) 14680 of 2022 & CM APPLs. 44991 of 2022, CM APPL. 45852 of 2022, 45853 of 2022, 56550 of 2022, 56551 of 2022, 4911 of 2023 & W.P.(C) 2368 of 2023 & CM APPL 9063 of 2023
Decided On : 17-05-2023

Advocates appeared:
Mr. Manoj Goel, Senior Advocate with Mr. Nishant Anand, Ms. Gunjan Bansal and Kumar Abhishek, Advocates, for the Petitioner in W.P.(C) 14677 of 2022 & CM APPLs. 44985 of 2022, 45790 of 2022, 45791 of 2022, 56595 of 2022, 56596 of 2022 & CM APPL. 4910 of 2023 & W.P.(C) 14679/2022 & CM APPLs. 44989/2022, 45788/2022, 45789/2022, 56560/2022, 56561/2022 & 4860/2023 & for the Respondent No.2,4, and 6 in W.P.(C) 11906/2022 & CM APPLs. 35534/2022, 39332/2022, 47386/2022 & for the Respondent No.3.6 and 7 in W.P.(C) 14347/2022 & CM APPL 43806/2022.
Mr. Santosh Kumar Tripathi, Standing Counsel (Civil) alongwith Mr. Utkarsh Singh & Mr. Tapesh Raghav, Advocates, for the Respondent No. 1 in W.P.(C) 14677 of 2022 & CM APPLs. 44985 of 2022, 45790 of 2022, 45791 of 2022, 56595 of 2022, 56596 of 2022 & CM APPL. 4910 of 2023 & W.P.(C) 14678/2022 & CM APPLs. 44987/2022, 45794/2022 & CM APPL. 45795/2022 & W.P.(C) 14679/2022 & CM APPLs. 44989/2022, 45788/2022, 45789/2022, 56560/2022, 56561/2022 & 4860/2023 & W.P.(C) 14680/2022 & CM APPLs. 44991/2022, CM APPL. 45852/2022, 45853/2022, 56550/2022, 56551/2022, 4911/2023 & for the Respondent in W.P.(C) 11906/2022 & CM APPLs. 35534/2022, 39332/2022, 47386/2022 & W.P.(C) 14347/2022 & CM APPL 43806/2022 & W.P.(C) 2368/2023 & CM APPL 9063/2023.
Mr. Anuj Aggarwal, ASC, GNCTD with Ms. Ayushi Bansal, Ms. Arshya Singh and Mr. Aakash Dahiya, Advocates, for the Respondent No. 2 in W.P.(C) 14677 of 2022 & CM APPLs. 44985 of 2022, 45790 of 2022, 45791 of 2022, 56595 of 2022, 56596 of 2022 & CM APPL. 4910 of 2023 & W.P.(C) 14678/2022 & CM APPLs. 44987/2022, 45794/2022 & CM APPL. 45795/2022 & W.P.(C) 14679/2022 & CM APPLs. 44989/2022, 45788/2022, 45789/2022, 56560/2022, 56561/2022 & 4860/2023 & W.P.(C) 14680/2022 & CM APPLs. 44991/2022, CM APPL. 45852/2022, 45853/2022, 56550/2022, 56551/2022, 4911/2023.
Ms. Anita Sahani, Advocate, for the Respondent No. 3 in W.P.(C) 14677 of 2022 & CM APPLs. 44985 of 2022, 45790 of 2022, 45791 of 2022, 56595 of 2022, 56596 of 2022 & CM APPL. 4910 of 2023 & W.P.(C) 14678/2022 & CM APPLs. 44987/2022, 45794/2022 & CM APPL. 45795/2022 & W.P.(C) 14679/2022 & CM APPLs. 44989/2022, 45788/2022, 45789/2022, 56560/2022, 56561/2022 & 4860/2023 & W.P.(C) 14680/2022 & CM APPLs. 44991/2022, CM APPL. 45852/2022, 45853/2022, 56550/2022, 56551/2022, 4911/2023 & W.P.(C) 11906/2022 & CM APPLs. 35534/2022, 39332/2022, 47386/2022 & W.P.(C) 14347/2022 & CM APPL 43806/2022.
Mr. Puneet Mittal, Senior Advocate with Mr. Utkarsh, Advocates, for the Petitioner in W.P.(C) 14678/2022 & CM APPLs. 44987/2022, 45794/2022 & CM APPL. 45795/2022 & for the Respodent No.5 in W.P.(C) 11906/2022 & CM APPLs. 35534/2022, 39332/2022, 47386/2022 & for the Respondent No.2 in W.P.(C) 16709/2022 & CM APPLs. 52732/2022, 55301/2022.
Mr. Mohit Mathur, Senior Advocate with Mr. Nishant Anand and Ms. Gunjan Bansal, Advocates, for the Petitioner in W.P.(C) 14680/2022 & CM APPLs. 44991/2022, CM APPL. 45852/2022, 45853/2022, 56550/2022, 56551/2022, 4911/2023.
Mr. Khagesh B. Jha & Ms. Shikha Sharma Bagga, Advocates, for the Petitioner in W.P.(C) 11906/2022 & CM APPLs. 35534/2022, 39332/2022, 47386/2022 & W.P.(C) 14347/2022 & CM APPL 43806/2022.
Mr. Adarsh Priyadarshi, Mr. Tarun K Bedi, Vikash Kumar ans Ms. Sweta Singh, Advocates, for the Respondent No.3 in W.P.(C) 11906/2022 & CM APPLs. 35534/2022, 39332/2022, 47386/2022.
Mr. Tarun K. Bedi with Vikash Kumar, Advocates, for the Respondent No.5 in W.P.(C) 14347/2022 & CM APPL 43806/2022.
W.P.(C) 2368/2023 & CM APPL 9063/2023
Mr. Manish Vashisht, Senior Advocate with Ms. Shikha Sharma Bagga and Mr. Vanshay Kaul, Advocates, for the Petitioner in W.P.(C) 2368/2023 & CM APPL 9063/2023.
Mr. Puneet Mittal, Senior Advocate with Mr. Kumar Utkarsh and Mr. Snehsish Mukherjee, Advocates, for the Respondent No. 1 and 2 in W.P.(C) 2368/2023 & CM APPL 9063/2023.
Mr. Rajshekhar Rao, Senior Advocate with Mr. Saurav Agarwal, Mr. Ashish Tiwari, Mr. Ajay Sharma, Mr. Sahib Patel, Advocates, for the Petitioner in W.P.(C) 16709/2022 & CM APPLs. 52732/2022, 55301/2022.
Ms. Anita Sahani, Advocate with Rahul Mourya, Advocates, for the Respondent No.1 in W.P.(C) 16709/2022 & CM APPLs. 52732/2022, 55301/2022.
Mr. Anuj Aggarwal, ASC, GNCTD along with Ms. Ayushi Bansal, Mr. Sanyam Suri & Ms. Arshya Singh, Advocates for Respondent No. 3 in W.P.(C) 16709/2022 & CM APPLs. 52732/2022, 55301/2022.
Mr. Kirti Uppal, Senior Advocate with Ms. Shikha Sharma Bagga, Advocate, for the Respondent-4 to Respondent-69 in W.P.(C) 16709/2022 & CM APPLs. 52732/2022, 55301/2022.
Mr. Manish Vashisht, Senior Advocate with Mr. Vanshay Kaul, Advocate, for the Respondents in W.P.(C) 16709/2022 & CM APPLs. 52732/2022, 55301/2022.

Headnote:(A) Delhi Professional Colleges or Institutions (Prohibition of Capitation Fee, Regulation of Admission, Fixation of Non-Exploitative Fee and Other Measures to Ensure Equity and Excellence) Act, 2007 - Sections 3(1), 12, 13, and 14 - Constitution of India - Article 19(1)(g) - The validity of Circulars regarding admissions against Management Quota Seats challenged by educational institutions. The Circulars aimed to bring transparency, specifying online portals for registration and merit lists. Court found Circulars did not infringe institutions' rights but encouraged fair admission practices (Paras 9, 11, 167).

Issues: The jurisdiction of the Government and legality of Circulars.

Ratio Decidendi: Court emphasized that legislation must frame clear regulations to ensure transparency in admissions, viewing Circulars as supplemental to existing laws (Paras 12, 172).

Result: Circulars upheld; admissions made in violation found void and the quota for the next academic year reduced to nil.

JUDGMENT

1. This batch of writ petitions involves common issues, viz-validity of Circulars dated 22.09.2022, 27.09.2022 and 14.10.2022; interpretation of applicable admission rules in the matter of admitting students under Management Quota Seats and the same is, thus, being decided by a common order. For the sake of clarity, facts are being extracted from W.P.(C) No. 14677/2022 titled as `Vivekananda Institute Of Professional Studies-Technical Campus v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi and Ors.`. However, wherever necessary, facts from individual matters will be adverted to and discussed.

2. The writ petitions being W.P.(C) 11906/2022 and W.P.(C) 14347/2022 have been filed by an aspirant, namely, Shubham Jha seeking admission in B.Tech course against the 10% Management Quota Seats in private unaided institutions. The petition being W.P.(C) 16709/2022 is filed by another aspirant, namely, Noorakshi Dahiya seeking admission against the 10% Management Quota Seats. The petition being W.P.(C) 2368/2023 is filed by the students, already admitted against the same 10% Management Quota Seats, by Maharaja Suraj Mal Institute of Technology (hereinafter referred to as `MSIT'). However, the University has not ratified their admission and has declared these admissions, as null and void.

3. The other four writ petitions being W.P.(C) 14677/2022, Vivekananda Institute of Professional Studies-Technical Campus; W.P.(C) 14678/2022, Surajmal Memorial Education Society (Regd.); W.P.(C) 14679/2022, Maharaja Agrasen Technical Educational Society and W.P.(C) 14680/2022, Bharati Vidayapeeth's College of Engineering, have been filed by private institutions, inter alia, against Circulars issued by the Respondents i.e. State of NCT of Delhi and Guru Gobind Singh Indraprastha University, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the `University').

4. The challenge in the petitions filed by the aforementioned institutions is against Circulars dated 22.09.2022, 27.09.2022 and 14.10.2022. Vide Circular dated 22.09.2022, the Directorate of Higher Education (hereinafter referred to as DHE) issued directions to the Vice Chancellor of the University with respect to the admissions against Management Seats in private institutions affiliated to the University. Vide Circular dated 27.09.2022, the University issued directions regarding online registration for Management Quota admissions on the University`s portal and the display of merit list on the said portal. Vide another Circular dated 14.10.2022, the University issued the Schedule for Online Registration for Management Seats Admissions for the Programme B. Tech (Code-131). It is pertinent to note that vide Circular dated 17.10.2022, the University reaffirmed its earlier Circular dated 14.10.2022, whereas, vide Circular dated 18.10.2022, the schedule for online registration for Management Seats was declared, however, the same have not been specifically challenged.

5. The challenge to the impugned Circulars is mainly on the ground of violation of Article 19(1)(g) of the Constitution of India and the same being issued without any jurisdiction and authority of law.

6. Mr. Manoj Goel, learned Senior Counsel assisted by Mr. Nishant Anand, Mr. Gunjan Bansal, Mr. Kumar Abhishek and Mr. Sachin Sharma, Advocates, submits that the Petitioner-institution, which is a private unaided professional educational institution, has the right to admit up to 10% seats under the Management Quota in accordance with The Delhi Professional Colleges or Institutions (Prohibition of Capitation Fee, Regulation of Admission, Fixation of Non-Exploitative Fee and Other Measures to Ensure Equity and Excellence) Act, 2007 (hereinafter referred to as the `Act of 2007') and The Delhi Professional Colleges or Institutions (Prohibition of Capitation Fee, Regulation of Admission, Fixation of Non-Exploitative Fee and Other Measures to Ensure Equity and Excellence) Rules, 2007 (hereinafter referred to as the `Rules of 2007'). Mr. Goel submits that, the impugned C


Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top