Back
SANJEEV NARULA
Erd Technologies Pvt. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Shree Ambeshwar Mobile Centre – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Sanjeev Narula, J. (Oral)--Present suit has been filed seeking inter alia, permanent injunction restraining infringement of registered trademark and copyright, passing off, delivery up, damages and costs.
2. Plaintiff-company is engaged in the business of manufacturing, marketing and selling of mobile phone batteries, travel chargers, car chargers, power banks, USB cables, universal battery charger, etc. under its registered trademark "[IMG]" and other formative variants thereof, registered under various classes [hereinafter collectively, "Plaintiff's marks"]. Since 1998, Plaintiff's predecessor continuously and extensively used the said marks. Following the amalgamation of the Plaintiff with its predecessor company, the ownership and legacy in said marks and copyrights vested therein have now been transferred to the Plaintiff.
3. Particulars of Plaintiff's trademark registrations are set out at paragraph No. 11. In addition to registrations in India, Plaintiff, through its predecessor has also secured registrations of its marks in several countries, including China, Nepal, Hong Kong, Sri Lanka etc.
4. Plaintiff has expended heavily towards sale and promotion of its prod
Infringing activities and lack of defense by the Defendant can lead to the award of damages and costs in favor of the Plaintiff.
The court applied the summary judgment procedure in commercial disputes to ensure timely resolution and emphasized the need for a realistic prospect of success in defending the claim.
Summary judgment can be granted in commercial disputes when the defendant lacks real prospects of successfully defending the claim.
Trademark infringement occurs when identical trademarks are used on counterfeit goods, leading to public confusion and deception.
The central legal point established in the judgment is the entitlement of the plaintiff to statutory protection and the grant of injunction for infringement under the Trademark Act, 1999.
Failure to contest a case can lead to deemed admissions of all facts mentioned in the plaint, and evidence presented by the Plaintiffs can satisfy the test required to prove infringement.
The court established that the trademark `LIMCEE` is protected against imitation by `LICMEE`, highlighting the importance of protecting goodwill and enforcing trademark rights.
Deceptive similarity between trademarks and packaging can lead to a finding of trademark infringement under the Indian Trademarks Act, 1999, Section 29.
Trademark infringement and passing off under the Trade Marks Act, 1999, and the seriousness of counterfeiting in eroding brand value and misleading consumers.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
