Back
MANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORA
Pritam Singh Through Lr – Appellant
Versus
Prem Kohliwal – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Manmeet Pritam Singh Arora, J. (Oral)--The present revision petition has been filed by the legal heir of the Petitioner, original Tenant assailing the order dated 04.07.2022 passed by CCJ-cum-ARC (Central), Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi (`the Trial Court'), whereby the eviction order with respect to the shop at ground floor, in property bearing No. 1768-1770, Street No. 53, Hardhian Singh Road, Naiwala, Karol Bagh, New Delhi-110005 (`the tenanted premises'), was passed in favour of the Respondents.
2. The Respondents (`Landlords') filed an eviction petition against the original Tenant under Section 14(1)(e) read with Section 25B of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 (`the DRC Act') for recovery of the possession of the tenanted premises on the ground of bona fide requirement for the wife of Respondent No.1 to commence the business of mobile sale/recharge from the tenanted premises.
3. It was stated in the eviction petition that when the tenanted premises was purchased by the Landlords herein, father of the original Tenant, Late Shri. Bhupinder Singh, was carrying on the business in the name and style of Nanak Motors, from the tenanted premises. After the demise of Late Shri. Bhu
The main legal point established in the judgment is that a tenant must file an affidavit stating the grounds on which he seeks to contest the application for eviction and obtain leave from the Contro....
Failure to file an application seeking leave to defend within the statutory period under the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958, results in the deemed admission of the landlord's statement in the eviction ....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the importance of ensuring the tenant's right to be heard before eviction by carefully examining the service of summons and scrutinizing each case ....
The Rent Controller cannot condone any delay in filing a leave to defend application, and a corporate entity can maintain an eviction petition for its bona fide need.
The Court emphasized the importance of proving a landlord's bona fide requirement for eviction and the need for tenants to provide evidence to rebut the landlord's assertions.
The court emphasized the need for the summons to be duly served with a legible copy of the paper book and applied the dual test of reasons beyond control for the delay and the substantial case for co....
The landlord-tenant relationship, the landlord's bona fide need, and the rent amount were key legal principles established in the judgment.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
