SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Del) 1840

MANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORA
Pritam Singh Through Lr – Appellant
Versus
Prem Kohliwal – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Mr. Kashish Bajaj, Advocate, for the Petitioner.
Mr. Dhruv Chawla, Advocate, for the Respondents.

JUDGMENT

Manmeet Pritam Singh Arora, J. (Oral)--The present revision petition has been filed by the legal heir of the Petitioner, original Tenant assailing the order dated 04.07.2022 passed by CCJ-cum-ARC (Central), Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi (`the Trial Court'), whereby the eviction order with respect to the shop at ground floor, in property bearing No. 1768-1770, Street No. 53, Hardhian Singh Road, Naiwala, Karol Bagh, New Delhi-110005 (`the tenanted premises'), was passed in favour of the Respondents.

2. The Respondents (`Landlords') filed an eviction petition against the original Tenant under Section 14(1)(e) read with Section 25B of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 (`the DRC Act') for recovery of the possession of the tenanted premises on the ground of bona fide requirement for the wife of Respondent No.1 to commence the business of mobile sale/recharge from the tenanted premises.

3. It was stated in the eviction petition that when the tenanted premises was purchased by the Landlords herein, father of the original Tenant, Late Shri. Bhupinder Singh, was carrying on the business in the name and style of Nanak Motors, from the tenanted premises. After the demise of Late Shri. Bhu

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top