Back
GIRISH KATHPALIA
Surinder Kumar Pawan Kumar Through Shri Surinder Kumar (Since Deceased) Through Lrs. – Appellant
Versus
Shri Laxman Das Dhanwaria – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Girish Kathpalia, J.
1. By way of this petition, brought under proviso to Section 25B(8) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, the petitioner/tenant has assailed order dated 21.01.2015 of the learned Additional Rent Controller, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi whereby the eviction petition filed by the respondent/landlord under Section 14(1)(e) of the Act was allowed since despite service of summons in the prescribed format, the petitioner/tenant opted not to file application seeking leave to contest the proceedings. On service of notice of the present proceedings, the respondent/landlord entered appearance through counsel. I heard learned counsel for both sides.
2. Briefly stated, relevant circumstances extracted from pleadings and records are as follows. The present respondent, claiming himself to be the owner and landlord in respect of the shop bearing private No. A (hereinafter referred to as "the subject premises") in the larger premises bearing No. 3506, Beadon Pura, Hardhyan Singh Road, Karol Bagh, New Delhi filed eviction petition against the present petitioner on the ground that he bona fide required the subject premises for his residential use and occupation. The learned Additiona
The main legal point established in the judgment is the importance of ensuring the tenant's right to be heard before eviction by carefully examining the service of summons and scrutinizing each case ....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the failure to file an application for leave to contest despite the service of summons in the prescribed format justifies an eviction order un....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the delay in filing an application for leave to contest under the Delhi Rent Control Act must be beyond the tenant's control and a substantial....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that a tenant must file an affidavit stating the grounds on which he seeks to contest the application for eviction and obtain leave from the Contro....
The court highlighted the importance of timely filing of application for leave to contest, valid reasons for extension, and the need for a substantial case for consideration of the application.
Failure to file an application seeking leave to defend within the statutory period under the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958, results in the deemed admission of the landlord's statement in the eviction ....
The tenant must apply for leave to contest within the statutory period, and the Rent Controller has no jurisdiction to condone the delay in filing such an application.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
