IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Jyoti Singh, J.
Bilal Ahmad – Appellant
Versus
Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Ors. – Respondents
W.P.(C) 11519 of 2022
Decided On : 03-02-2023
Suspension - Subsistence Allowance - Release of Subsistence Allowance
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner, a teacher at a government-aided school, was suspended and sought release of subsistence allowance as per the Delhi School Education Rules, 1973. The school cited dependency on government grant for the delay.
Finding of the Court:
The court disposed of the writ petition with a direction for the release of subsistence allowance to the petitioner within four weeks, with a provision for interest if the payment is delayed. The court also mandated future timely payment of subsistence allowance until the suspension is revoked.
Issues: Release of subsistence allowance, Dependency on government grant, Timely payment of subsistence allowance
Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized the obligation to release subsistence allowance as per the rules, and held the government liable for interest in case of delayed payment. It also stressed the importance of timely payment of subsistence allowance during the suspension period.
Final Decision: The court directed the release of subsistence allowance within four weeks and mandated future timely payments, with liability for interest in case of delay.
JUDGMENT
Jyoti Singh, J. (Oral)--Petitioner is a PGT (Hindi) teacher with Respondents No. 2 and 3-School, which is a Government aided school drawing 95% aid. Petitioner was implicated in a criminal case on 20.09.2014 and arrested. He was placed under suspension with immediate effect by the Managing Committee of the School vide letter dated 20.09.2014. Suspension was approved by the Directorate of Education. Subsequently, Petitioner was released on regular bail on 30.07.2015.
2. Subsistence allowance was paid to the Petitioner from September, 2014 upto January, 2017 and was unilaterally stopped from February, 2017. Several representations are stated to have been made by the Petitioner for release of subsistence allowance and reinstatement but to no avail. It is the case of the Petitioner that the Managing Committee of the School on various occasions recommended and forwarded the case of the Petitioner for release of subsistence allowance from February, 2017, but no approval has been forthcoming from the Directorate of Education constraining the Petitioner to approach this Court.
3. By way of the present writ petition, Petitioner seeks release of subsistence allowance from February, 2017 in accordance with provisions of Rule 116 of the Delhi School Education Rules, 1973 including arrears and interest thereon. Direction is also sought to continue the payment of subsistence allowance in future till the suspension is revoked.
4. Counter affidavit filed on behalf of the School reflects that the matter for release of the subsistence allowance to the Petitioner is pending with Respondent No. 1 for approval including revision of pay fixation as per 7th CPC in that context and till date the approval has not been received. The School is an aided school and is dependent on 95% grant of the Government and as per procedure is unable to release the subsistence allowance in the absence of approval from the Directorate of Education.
5. Ms. Latika Chaudhary, learned counsel appearing on behalf of Respondent No.1/Directorate of Education, on instructions, states that the subsistence allowance due to the Petitioner with effect from February, 2017 shall be released to the Petitioner positively within a period of four weeks from today and requisite steps shall be taken to ensure that in future the subsistence allowance is paid within time and without any delay till the suspension is revoked, in accordance with law.
6. Recording the statement made and assurance given on behalf of Respondent No. 1, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction that the subsistence allowance due to the Petitioner from February, 2017 shall be released to the Petitioner within a period of four weeks from today, failing which Respondent No. 1 shall be liable to pay interest @ 9% per annum from February, 2017 till the date of actual payment. Respondents shall ensure that subsistence allowance is paid in future, without any delay, till the Petitioner remains under suspension.
AI
School management liable for subsistence allowance post six-month suspension period under Rule 30(4) proviso, regardless of approval delays.
Upon reinstatement after suspension, the appointing authority must determine subsistence allowance and recognize the entire service length for benefits, not treating reinstatement as a fresh appointm....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.