JUDGMENT

Satish Chandra Sharma, C.J. (Oral)

REVIEW PETITION 46/2023

1. The present review petition is arising out of an order dated 22.11.2022 passed by this Court in W.P.(C.) No. 4301/2017.

2. The facts of the case reveal that a writ petition was preferred by the Petitioner as a Public Interest Litigation in the year 2017 claiming himself to be General Secretary Sambhavana Organization challenging the appointments of Respondent Nos. 5 to 17 on the ground that they do not have the requisite qualifications to be appointed as Teachers.

3. The Respondent Nos.1 and 2/GNCTD did file a detailed and exhaustive affidavit furnishing all minute details in respect of qualification of the Teachers stating that the teachers in question were fulfilling the requisite qualifications as prescribed under the Recruitment Rules and after taking into account the contents on affidavit, the PIL stands disposed of.

4. The Petitioner has filed a review and has vehemently argued before this Court that by no stretch of imagination the Petition could have been dismissed as non-maintainable and this Court has committed an error apparent on the face of record by relying upon the judgment delivered in the case