SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Del) 2931

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Najmi Waziri, Sudhir Kumar Jain, JJ.
Sahil Arora – Appellant
Versus
Commissioner of Excise Government of National Capital Territory of Delhi & Ors. – Respondents
LPA 92 of 2023
Decided On : 14-02-2023

Advocates appeared:
Mr. Sudhir Nandrajog, Senior Advocate with Mr. Prashant Sivarajan, Mr. Saharsh Jauhari, Mr. Sustine George and Mr. Surya Kumar Singh, Advocates, for the Appellant.
Mr. Santosh Kumar Tripathi, Standing Counsel (Civil)m GNCTD along with Mr. Arun Panwar, Advocate, for the GNCTD.

The personal assets of partners in a limited liability partnership are protected and cannot be attached for recovery of LLP's liabilities.

Headnote:

LLP - Recovery of Excise Duty - Delhi Excise Act, 2009, Section 29 - The court discussed the liability of partners in a limited liability partnership (LLP) under sections 27(3), 27(4), 28 of the LLP Act, 2008 and the recovery of duty and other levies under section 29 of the Delhi Excise Act. The court held that the personal assets of a partner in an LLP are protected and cannot be attached for recovery of LLP's liabilities. The impugned order directing a partner to deposit Rs. 1 crore from his personal assets was set aside.

Fact of the Case:

The Recovery Certificate was issued under section 29 of the Delhi Excise Act, 2009 for recovery of an amount payable by M/s Popular Spirits LLP. The impugned order stayed the attachment proceedings but directed deposit of Rs.1 crore with the Excise Department from the personal assets of the LLP partner.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the directions to deposit Rs. 1 crore from the personal assets of the LLP partner were unwarranted as the liability of the LLP does not extend to the personal assets of its partners.

Issues: Liability of partners in a limited liability partnership, attachment of personal assets for recovery of LLP's liabilities, interpretation of sections 27(3), 27(4), 28 of the LLP Act, 2008 and section 29 of the Delhi Excise Act.

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the personal assets of a partner in an LLP are protected and cannot be attached for recovery of LLP's liabilities.

Final Decision: The impugned order directing a partner to deposit Rs. 1 crore from his personal assets was set aside. The LLP was given the option to file its list of assets with the Excise Department for further action as per law.

JUDGMENT

Najmi Waziri, J. (Oral)

The hearing has been conducted through hybrid mode (physical and virtual hearing).

CM APPL. 5934/2023 (Exmp.)

1. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.

2. The application stands disposed-off.

LPA 92/2023, CM APPL. 5932/2023 (for interim directions) & CM APPL. 5933/2023 (for placing additional documents)

3. The case has been received on transfer.

4. Issue notice. The learned counsel named above accepts notice on behalf of GNCTD.

5. At joint request, the appeal is taken up for disposal.

6. Pursuant to the Recovery Certificate dated 04.10.2022 issued under section 29 of the Delhi Excise Act, 2009 for recovery of an amount of Rs.98,28,771/- payable by M/s Popular Spirits LLP, the personal property of the appellant- Mr. Sahil Arora, the LLP partner in Gurgaon at S-22/5, 2nd Floor, DLF Phase-III, Gurgaon was sought to be attached. Similarly, the leased property in Delhi identified as D-240, 3rd Floor, Defence Colony, New Delhi was also sought to be attached. The impugned order dated 13.01.2023 stayed the attachment proceedings but has simultaneously directed deposit of an amount of Rs.1 crore with the Excise Department within four weeks.

7. Mr. Sudhir Nandrajog, the learned Senior Advocate for the appellant submits that the impugned order has erred in directing the appellant to deposit the said money. The appellant is one of the three partners. The licencee is a limited liability partnership firm. Its liabilities cannot be recovered from the personal assets of its partners in terms of sections 27(3) & (4) and section 28 of the LLP Act, 2008 which reads as under:

    "Section 27: Extent of liability of limited liability partnership.

    ....

    ....

    (3) An obligation of the limited liability partnership whether arising in contract or otherwise, shall be solely the obligation of the limited liability partnership.

    (4) The liabilities of the limited liability partnership shall be met out of the property of the limited liability partnership."

    Section 28. Extent of liability of partner.

    (1) A partner is not personally liable, directly or indirectly for an obligation referred to in sub-section (3) of section 27 solely by reason of being a partner of the limited liability partnership.

    (2) The provisions of sub-section (3) of section 27 and sub-section (1) of this section shall not affect the personal liability of a partner for his own wrongful act or omission, but a partner shall not be personally liable for the wrongful act or omission of any other partner of the limited liability partnership."

8. Section 29 of the Delhi Excise Act gives a lien to the Excise Department for the recovery of duty and other levies from the defaulter. It reads as under:

    "29. Recovery of duty and other levies and lien on the property of defaulter

    (1) All excise revenue, payable to the Government under this Act, may be recovered from the person liable to pay the same or his legal successors or from his surety or his agent as if they were the arrears of land revenue.

    (2) In the event of default in payment of excise revenue or otherwise, by any person licensed under this Act, his manufactory, warehouse, shop or premises and all fittings, apparatus, stocks of liquor or material for the manufacture of the same, held therein shall be liable to be attached towards any claim for excise revenue or in respect of any loss incurred by the Government through such default and be sold to satisfy such claim which shall be the first charge upon the proceeds of such sale.

    (3) Where duty due is not levied or not paid or short-levied or short-paid or erroneously refunded,-

    (a) the Assistant Commissioner may, within four years from the relevant date, serve notice on the person chargeable with the duty which has not been levied or paid or which has been short- levied or short-paid or to whom the refund has erroneously been made, requiring him to show cause why he should not pay the amount specified in the notice.

    Explanation I: Where the service of the notice is stayed

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top