SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Del) 2814

GAURANG KANTH
I. A. R. I. – Appellant
Versus
Om Prakash – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Mr. Gagan Mathur, Mr. Varun Kumar and Mr. Shitanshu, Advocates, for the Petitioner.

JUDGMENT

Gaurang Kanth, J. The Petitioner in the present Writ Petition is assailing the Award dated 23.03.1999 ("Impugned Award") passed by the Presiding Officer, Industrial Tribunal-II, Tis Hazari Courts, New Delhi in I.D Complaint No.1117/89 titled as `Om Prakash Vs IARI'.

2. The Respondent/workman filed an Application under Section 33A of the Industrial Disputes Act (I.D. Act) before the learned Labour Court alleging that the Petitioner/Management terminated his service during the pendency of an industrial dispute between the Petitioner/Management and its Workman relating to certain demands unconnected with the present dispute. The said action of the Petitioner/Management has hence resulted in contravention of Section 33 of the I.D. Act. Vide the Impugned Award, the learned Labour Court held that the Petitioner/Management terminated the service of the Respondent/Workman in contravention of Section 33 of the I.D. Act. Learned Labour Court further held that the Petitioner/Management failed to prove the misconduct and hence the termination was held to be illegal. In view of the same, the learned Labour Court directed the reinstatement of the Respondent/workman with back wages from

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top