SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Del) 2628

MANOJ KUMAR OHRI
Shriram General Insurance Company Limited – Appellant
Versus
Nasim – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Mr. Sameer Nandwani, Advocate, for the Appellant.
None, for the Respondents.

JUDGMENT

Manoj Kumar Ohri, J. (Oral)

CM APPL. 5759/2023

1. By way of present application filed under Sections 5 and 14 of the Limitation Act read with Section 151 CPC, the appellant seeks condonation of delay of 95 days in filing the appeal.

2. For the reasons stated in the application, the same is allowed and the delay of 95 days in filing the appeal is condoned.

3. Application is disposed of.

FAO 26/2023, CM APPL. 5758/2023 & CM APPL. 5760/2023

4. By way of present appeal filed under Section 30 of the Employees' Compensation Act, 1923 (hereinafter, the `EC Act'), the appellant has assailed the order dated 30.08.2022 passed by the learned Commissioner, Employees' Compensation in Case No.CEC/I/57/WD/15/200, whereby claim petition filed by respondent No.1/claimant seeking injury compensation was allowed and the appellant directed to deposit Rs.10,75,200/- alongwith interest @ 12% p.a. w.e.f. 02.08.2010 till its realization.

5. After initial submissions, Mr. Sameer Nandwani, learned counsel for the appellant, has restricted his challenge to the contention that the failure of respondent No.1 to produce his driving license vitiated the award of compensation.

6. A perusal of the pres

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top