DINESH KUMAR SHARMA
Ankur Saluja – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Dinesh Kumar Sharma, J. (Oral)--Briefly stated facts of the case are that the disputes had arisen on account of the alleged non-payment by the petitioner Ankur Saluja. These disputes gave rise to the FIR bearing No.298/2018 under Section 420 IPC, PS K.N. Katju Marg and a complaint under Section 138 Negotiable Instrument Act, 1881 bearing CC No.198/2018 titled as Bhushan Tyagi vs. Ankur Saluja. In the complaint under Section 138 Negotiable Instrument Act, 1891, the petitioner was declared a proclaimed offender. Aggrieved of this, the petitioner filed Crl.M.C.942/2020 for quashing of FIR bearing No.298/2018 under Section 420 IPC.
2. Learned counsel for the parties submit that pursuant to the reference of the matter to the Delhi High Court Mediation & Conciliation Centre, the parties have entered into the settlement vide Settlement Agreement dated 02.09.2022.
3. The terms and conditions of the settlement agreement dated 02.09.2022 are as under:
1. The First Party shall pay a sum of Rs.20,00,000/- (Rupees "Twenty Lakhs Only) to the Second Party towards the full and final settlement amount in respect to all the outstanding of the Second Party and also for the settlement of all
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.