IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Prathiba M. Singh, J.
Kuldeep & Anr. – Appellants
Versus
Union of India & Anr. – Respondents
W.P.(C) 4624 of 2021
Decided On : 28-02-2023
Adoption - Recognition of Adoption Deed - Hindu Adoption and Maintenance Act, 1956 - Sections 15 & 16
Fact of the Case:
The petitioners seek recognition of the registered adoption deed dated 25th September, 2019 for their adopted daughter Palak without the declaration of a Civil Court.
Finding of the Court:
The court declared Palak as the adoptive daughter of the petitioners based on the genuineness of the adoption between two brothers and their wives, and the registered adoption deed through a competent authority in accordance with law.
Issues: Recognition of the adoption deed without a declaration of a Civil Court, entitlement to benefits for the adoptive child.
Ratio Decidendi: The court relied on the provisions of the Hindu Adoption and Maintenance Act, 1956, and established that no decree of Court of law would be required to recognize the registered adoption deed of Palak, as the adoption deed was duly registered and there was no third party challenge to the same.
Final Decision: Palak is declared as the adoptive daughter of the petitioners. The GNCTD is directed to publish Part II order to the effect that Palak is the adoptive daughter of the petitioners.
JUDGMENT
Prathiba M. Singh, J. (Oral)--This hearing has been done through hybrid mode.
2. The present petition has been filed by Petitioner No.1 - Shri Kuldeep and his wife Petitioner No.2 - Smt. Suman Lata seeking recognition of the registered adoption deed dated 25th September, 2019 without the declaration of a Civil Court. The prayers in this petition are as under:
"A. Issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to recognize the adoption deed dated 25.9.2019 as valid and further directing the respondents for publication of part II order for the birth of adopted daughter for baby Palak by the petitioners and further directing the respondents to provide requisite benefits which are available to the daughter of the petitioners of being employed with Respondent No.1 which has been denied by the Respondent No. 2 vide Letter dated 28.05.2020;"
3. The Petitioner No.1's brother Mr. Dinesh and his wife Smt. Babita were married on 2nd March, 2006 and were blessed with a baby girl - Palak on 10th September, 2018. The Petitioner No.1, who was serving as a soldier in the Indian Army, took VRS on 31st October, 2018. Pursuant to an understanding between the two couples, Palak was agreed to be given in adoption by Shri Dinesh and his wife Smt. Babita to the Petitioners. The girl is stated to have been given in adoption to the Petitioners in front of relatives, friends and villagers.
4. The names of the Petitioners were incorporated in the birth certificate of Palak issued by the Municipal Corporation of Delhi and the adoption was carried out through an adoption deed dated 25th September, 2019, which was registered with the Sub-Registrar - IX A, Delhi. The said registered adoption deed has been placed on record.
5. Since the Petitioner No.1 is an ex-army personnel, he sought updation of his service record and registration of Palak as his daughter with the Respondent No.2 - Rajya Sainik Board (RSB), GNCTD on 4th November, 2019. On 11th November, 2019, the RSB informed the Petitioner that the adoption deed was not from the competent authority i.e. the District Court of law, hence, registration of Palak as his daughter cannot be considered. The said letter is as under:
Letter dated 11th November, 2019
" Mil Tele: 6335
Civ No: 0581-2518800
Intranet E-Mail ID: cro_recordsjr
Internet EMaiIID: cro.jrcbly_army@nic.in
Web: http://Recordsjat_army.mil(6321)
JAT Regiment Abhilekh Karyalaya
Records The JAT Regiment
PIN: 900496
c/o 56 APO
3196637/SR-JR/NEL-11
11 Nov 2019
No 3196637W Ex Sep Kuldeep
VPO - Issapur
Delhi-110073
Mob No.-9717380857
PUBLICATION OF PART II ORDER
1. Please refer to your petition received through Rajya Sainik Board vide letter No.26/C/RSB/04 dated 04 Nov 2019.
2. Documents received vide your petition under reference are retained with your service documents for wants of following clarification/documents through Zila Sainik Board.
(a) An adoption deed from the competent authority i.e. District Court of Law in original not found enclosed.
Sd/-
Senior Record Officer
for OIC Records"
6. Subsequently, the RSB vide its letter dated 6th March, 2020 recommended the case for publication. The said letter is as under:
Letter dated 6th March, 2020
"Phono No: 011-2381360
Fax No: 011-23881876
Email: rsbdelhi@nic.in
Rajya Sainik Board
Govt of NCT Delhi
4th Floor, Tower Block.
Maharana Pratap ISBT
Kashmere Gate
Delhi-110006
No: 261C1RSBI06
Dated: 06 03.2020
THE RECORDS JAT REGIMENT
PIN-900496. C/O 56 APO
PUBLICATION OF PART II ORDER
1. Pleaser refer to your letter No. 3196637W/SR7JR/NEL-11 dated 11 Nov2019.
2. It is to Inform you that Adoption Deed signed by Sub Registrar, New Delhi for adoption of female child by No. 3196637W Ex Sep Kuldeep has already been forwarded to your office, in original vide our letter No26/C/RSB/04 dated 04 Nov 2019 photocopy of the same is also enclosed herewith.
3. It is requested to publish Part II Order for Birth in respect of adopted female child at the earliest and copy of same be forwarded to above named ESM for record.
Sd/-
Secretary
Rajya Sain
Recognition of a registered adoption deed does not require a decree of Court of law if the formalities for adoption have been completed, the adoption deed has been duly registered, and there is no th....
The burden of proof lies on the claimant to establish valid adoption as per statutory requirements; registered deeds are rebuttable and do not eliminate the need for actual proof.
The central legal point established in the judgment is the requirement to prove adoption strictly in accordance with the provisions of the Hindu Adoptions and Maintenance Act, 1956, including the con....
Adoption requires strict adherence to legal prerequisites, including consent from both biological parents, making an invalid registration insufficient for legitimacy.
The validity of an adoption requires strict compliance with statutory conditions, including the consent of the biological mother, and such conditions were not met in this case.
An adoption deed, once registered, is presumed valid under Section 16 of the Hindu Adoption and Maintenance Act unless disproved, and courts must provide reasons for any conclusions drawn against its....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the adoption deed was obtained by fraud and misrepresentation, and the physical act of giving and taking of adoption did not take place in acc....
The court affirmed that for a valid adoption, the consent of the adopting father's wife and proof of the ceremony of giving and taking are mandatory under the Maintenance and Adoption Act, 1956.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.