IN THE HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD
SAURABH SHYAM SHAMSHERY, J.
Uttam Chandra And 2 Others - Petitioners
Versus
State of U.P. And 10 Others - Respondents
WRIT B NO. 3822 OF 2023.
Decided On : 30-11-2023
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. dispute over adoption and property inheritance. (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 2. invalidation of will due to suspicious circumstances. (Para 6) |
| 3. arguments on validity of adoption and inheritance rights. (Para 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11) |
| 4. judicial analysis of adoption and inheritance issues. (Para 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23) |
| 5. dismissal of petitions due to merit. (Para 19) |
| 6. entitlement of daughters based on inheritance law. (Para 24) |
| 7. writ petitions dismissed as sans merit. (Para 25 , 26) |
JUDGMENT
Saurabh Shyam Shamshery, J.
The counsel for rival parties are in agreement that these writ petitions could be decided without exchange of pleadings since entire pleadings are on record and that matter involve mainly legal issues.
2. Both these writ petitions are arising out of a dispute amongst family members with regard to a registered adoption deed, an unregistered Will as well as compromise entered between parties before Consolidation Authorities.
3. It is not in dispute that land in dispute belongs to Brij Nandan, who had two daughters, namely, Triveni and Rama Devi. Triveni has four sons including Tek Chand, whereas Rama Devi has three sons. An adoption deed was registered to the effect that Brij Nandan has adopted Tek Chand, i.e., his daughter's (Triveni's) i.e. his grand son.
4. During consolidation proceedings rival objections were filed which were decided by the Consolidation Officer by an order dated 19.03.2014 whereby adoption deed as well as Will were held to be not proved and on basis of a compromise between parties shares were allotted that Rama Devi has relinquished her rights. Relevant part of order is mentioned hereinafter:-
^^loZizFke Jh fouksn dqekj }kjk izLrqr olh;rukek dks ns[krs gSa i=koyh dk voyksdu djus ls ;g Kkr gks jgk gS fd Jh fouksn dqekj ds firk Jh }kfjdk izlkn rFkk o`tuanu ds e/; ,d eqdnek xzke vejsgh esa fuxjkuh la0 1592@79 py jgh Fkh ftlesa o`tuanu ds e`rd gksus ij muds izfrLFkkiu gsrq VsdpUnz] Jherh jkensoh rFkk Jherh f=os.kh ,oa fouksn dqekj iq= }kfjdk izlkn dh rjQ ls nkok fd;k x;k ;gka ,d rF; le> ls ijs gS fd ftl }kfjdk izlkn dh rjQ ls nkok fd;k x;k ;gka ,d rF; le> ls ijs gS fd ftl }kfjdk izlkn ds lkFk c`tuanu dk eqdnek py jgk gks mlds iq= ds uke os olh;r dSls djsaxsA ;g lansg mRiUu dj jgk gS rFkk olh;r dh oS/krk ij iz'ufpag mBk jgk gSA
vc olh;r dks ns[krs gSa olh;r viathd`r gS rFkk mlesa ys[kd dk gLrk{kj olh;rdrkZ ds ckn gS lkFk gh olh;r esa mfYyf[kr rF; Hkh ;g gS fd olh;rdrkZ VsdpUnz tks fd lu 1980 esa ek= 7 o"kZ dk gksxk mlls ukjkt gksdj vius vU; ukfr;ksa dks NksM+dj ,d ckgjh O;fDr dks ftlds firk ds lkFk mldk eqdnek py jgk gks mls olh;r djs ;g fLFkfr loZFkk lansg ds ?ksjs esa gS rFkk olh;r dks xyr fl) dj jgh gS 2011&vkj,yVh&33 esa ikfjr O;oLFkk esa ;g dgk x;k gS fd ;fn olh;r esa fof.kd okfjlksa dks ldkj.k vf/kdkj ls oafpr ugha fd;k x;k gks rks olh;r lansgtud gSA 2004&vkjMh&245 rFkk 2003 & ,vkbZlh ¼8½ esa Hkh ;gh O;oLFkk ekuuh; mPp U;k;ky; iatkc@gfj;k.kk us nh gSA bl rjg olh;r vius vki esa lansgkRed gS vr% olh;r ds vk/kkj ij fouksn dqekj dh vkifRr Lohdkj dj mUgsa okfjl ugha ekuk tk ldrk gS vr% fouksn dh vkifRr fujLr dh tkrh gSA
vc o`tuanu ds ojklr ds laca/k esa VsdpUnz dh vkifRr dks ns[krs gSa tks fd iathd`r xksnukek ds vk/kkj ij gS mYys[kuh; gS fd jkeknsoh us viuk gd VsdpUnz ds lkFk le>kSrk dj bl i=koyh esa NksM+ fn;k gS vr% i=koyh esa nks i{k cprs gSaA
vc iathd`r xksnukek ij utj Mkyrs gS ;g xksnukek rhu i`"Bksa esa gS rFkk LVSai dh [kjhn 26-04-1977 dks fd;k x;k ,oa fnukad 27-04-1977 dks xksnukek fy[kk x;k ,oa i`"B 16 ij fnukad 28-04-1977 dks iathd`r fd;k x;kA
xksnukek esa ;g fy[kk x;k gS fd xksnukek dh jLe fnukad 29-03-1977 dks iwjh dh x;h rFkk blesa VsdpUnz ds firk ckcwjke rFkk mudh ekrk f=os.kh dh lgefr ls xksn fy;k fn;k x;k bl xksnukesa ij o`tuanu ckcwjke rFkk xokgksa lkfyxjke ,oa nqxkZizlkn ds gLrk{kj gSa f=os.kh nsoh ¼ekrk½ dk gLrk{kj xksnukesa ij ugha gSA
vc lkfyxjke ¼xokg½ ,oa iz/kku ds c;ku dks i<+rs gSa lkfyxjke us vius c;ku esa ;g dgk gS fd xksnukesa ds
Bharat Barrel & Drum Manufacturing Company v. Amin Chand Payrelal
Dhanno wd/o Balbir Singh v. Tuhi Ram (Died) represented by his Lrs.
G. Vasu v. Syed Yaseen Sifuddin Quadri
L. Debi Prasad v. Tribeni Devi
Lakshman Singh Kothari v. Rup Kanwar (Smt) alias Rup Kanwar Bai
Laxmibai (Dead) through LRs. v. Bhagwantbuva (Dead) through Lrs.
M. Vanaja v. M. Sarla Devi (Dead)
Moturu Nalini Kanth v. Gainedi Kaliprasad (Dead, Through Lrs.)
Adoption requires strict adherence to legal prerequisites, including consent from both biological parents, making an invalid registration insufficient for legitimacy.
The validity of an adoption requires strict compliance with statutory conditions, including the consent of the biological mother, and such conditions were not met in this case.
The court affirmed that for a valid adoption, the consent of the adopting father's wife and proof of the ceremony of giving and taking are mandatory under the Maintenance and Adoption Act, 1956.
The burden of proof lies on the claimant to establish valid adoption as per statutory requirements; registered deeds are rebuttable and do not eliminate the need for actual proof.
An adoption deed, once registered, is presumed valid under Section 16 of the Hindu Adoption and Maintenance Act unless disproved, and courts must provide reasons for any conclusions drawn against its....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the adoption deed was obtained by fraud and misrepresentation, and the physical act of giving and taking of adoption did not take place in acc....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.