SAURABH SHYAM SHAMSHERY
Uttam Chandra – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. dispute over adoption and property inheritance. (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 2. invalidation of will due to suspicious circumstances. (Para 6) |
| 3. arguments on validity of adoption and inheritance rights. (Para 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11) |
| 4. judicial analysis of adoption and inheritance issues. (Para 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23) |
| 5. dismissal of petitions due to merit. (Para 19) |
| 6. entitlement of daughters based on inheritance law. (Para 24) |
| 7. writ petitions dismissed as sans merit. (Para 25 , 26) |
JUDGMENT
Saurabh Shyam Shamshery, J.
The counsel for rival parties are in agreement that these writ petitions could be decided without exchange of pleadings since entire pleadings are on record and that matter involve mainly legal issues.
2. Both these writ petitions are arising out of a dispute amongst family members with regard to a registered adoption deed, an unregistered Will as well as compromise entered between parties before Consolidation Authorities.
3. It is not in dispute that land in dispute belongs to Brij Nandan, who had two daughters, namely, Triveni and Rama Devi. Triveni has four sons including Tek Chand, whereas Rama Devi has three sons. An adoption d
Bharat Barrel & Drum Manufacturing Company v. Amin Chand Payrelal
Dhanno wd/o Balbir Singh v. Tuhi Ram (Died) represented by his Lrs.
G. Vasu v. Syed Yaseen Sifuddin Quadri
L. Debi Prasad v. Tribeni Devi
Lakshman Singh Kothari v. Rup Kanwar (Smt) alias Rup Kanwar Bai
Laxmibai (Dead) through LRs. v. Bhagwantbuva (Dead) through Lrs.
M. Vanaja v. M. Sarla Devi (Dead)
Moturu Nalini Kanth v. Gainedi Kaliprasad (Dead, Through Lrs.)
Adoption requires strict adherence to legal prerequisites, including consent from both biological parents, making an invalid registration insufficient for legitimacy.
The validity of an adoption requires strict compliance with statutory conditions, including the consent of the biological mother, and such conditions were not met in this case.
The court affirmed that for a valid adoption, the consent of the adopting father's wife and proof of the ceremony of giving and taking are mandatory under the Maintenance and Adoption Act, 1956.
The burden of proof lies on the claimant to establish valid adoption as per statutory requirements; registered deeds are rebuttable and do not eliminate the need for actual proof.
An adoption deed, once registered, is presumed valid under Section 16 of the Hindu Adoption and Maintenance Act unless disproved, and courts must provide reasons for any conclusions drawn against its....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the adoption deed was obtained by fraud and misrepresentation, and the physical act of giving and taking of adoption did not take place in acc....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.