SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(All) 2571

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD
SAURABH SHYAM SHAMSHERY, J.
Uttam Chandra And 2 Others - Petitioners
Versus
State of U.P. And 10 Others - Respondents
WRIT B NO. 3822 OF 2023.
Decided On : 30-11-2023

Advocates appeared:
For the Petitioner:Vaibhav Shandilya,Sr. Advocate.
For the Respondent: C.S.C, Awadhesh Kumar Singh, Sandeep Kumar.

Adoption requires strict adherence to legal prerequisites, including consent from both biological parents, making an invalid registration insufficient for legitimacy.

Headnote:(A) Hindu Adoption and Maintenance Act, 1956 - Sections 6 and 11(vi) - Adoption validity requirements - Registration of deed without adherence to necessary processes does not validate adoption. Court reinforces that consent of both biological parents is mandatory for lawful adoption. (Paras 13-24)

(B) Wills - Unregistered Will held as disputed due to suspicious circumstances surrounding its execution - No interference warranted in concurrent findings rejecting its validity. (Paras 20-24)

(C) Compromise deeds - Compromise alleged but not proven and disputed, thus dismissed by authorities. (Paras 21-24)

Facts of the case:
Dispute regarding an adoption deed and Will between two daughters of the deceased. The adoption deed was held invalid as it lacked necessary parental consent and procedural compliance, and the Will was considered suspicious and unregistered.

Findings of Court:
The Court upheld the rejection of the adoption deed and Will, affirming the equal inheritance rights between the daughters based on the law of succession.

Issues: The main issues pertained to the validity of the adoption, the legitimacy of the Will, and the applicability of the compromise deed.

Ratio Decidendi: The court concluded that for an adoption to be valid, all statutory conditions must be fulfilled, including parental consent, which was absent in this case; hence, the adoption deed was rightly disbelieved.

Result: Writ petitions dismissed.

Table of Content
1. dispute over adoption and property inheritance. (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 5)
2. invalidation of will due to suspicious circumstances. (Para 6)
3. arguments on validity of adoption and inheritance rights. (Para 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11)
4. judicial analysis of adoption and inheritance issues. (Para 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23)
5. dismissal of petitions due to merit. (Para 19)
6. entitlement of daughters based on inheritance law. (Para 24)
7. writ petitions dismissed as sans merit. (Para 25 , 26)

JUDGMENT

Saurabh Shyam Shamshery, J.

The counsel for rival parties are in agreement that these writ petitions could be decided without exchange of pleadings since entire pleadings are on record and that matter involve mainly legal issues.

2. Both these writ petitions are arising out of a dispute amongst family members with regard to a registered adoption deed, an unregistered Will as well as compromise entered between parties before Consolidation Authorities.

3. It is not in dispute that land in dispute belongs to Brij Nandan, who had two daughters, namely, Triveni and Rama Devi. Triveni has four sons including Tek Chand, whereas Rama Devi has three sons. An adoption deed was registered to the effect that Brij Nandan has adopted Tek Chand, i.e., his daughter's (Triveni's) i.e. his grand son.

4. During consolidation proceedings rival objections were filed which were decided by the Consolidation Officer by an order dated 19.03.2014 whereby adoption deed as well as Will were held to be not proved and on basis of a compromise between parties shares were allotted that Rama Devi has relinquished her rights. Relevant part of order is mentioned hereinafter:-

    ^^loZizFke Jh fouksn dqekj }kjk izLrqr olh;rukek dks ns[krs gSa i=koyh dk voyksdu djus ls ;g Kkr gks jgk gS fd Jh fouksn dqekj ds firk Jh }kfjdk izlkn rFkk o`tuanu ds e/; ,d eqdnek xzke vejsgh esa fuxjkuh la0 1592@79 py jgh Fkh ftlesa o`tuanu ds e`rd gksus ij muds izfrLFkkiu gsrq VsdpUnz] Jherh jkensoh rFkk Jherh f=os.kh ,oa fouksn dqekj iq= }kfjdk izlkn dh rjQ ls nkok fd;k x;k ;gka ,d rF; le> ls ijs gS fd ftl }kfjdk izlkn dh rjQ ls nkok fd;k x;k ;gka ,d rF; le> ls ijs gS fd ftl }kfjdk izlkn ds lkFk c`tuanu dk eqdnek py jgk gks mlds iq= ds uke os olh;r dSls djsaxsA ;g lansg mRiUu dj jgk gS rFkk olh;r dh oS/krk ij iz'ufpag mBk jgk gSA

    vc olh;r dks ns[krs gSa olh;r viathd`r gS rFkk mlesa ys[kd dk gLrk{kj olh;rdrkZ ds ckn gS lkFk gh olh;r esa mfYyf[kr rF; Hkh ;g gS fd olh;rdrkZ VsdpUnz tks fd lu 1980 esa ek= 7 o"kZ dk gksxk mlls ukjkt gksdj vius vU; ukfr;ksa dks NksM+dj ,d ckgjh O;fDr dks ftlds firk ds lkFk mldk eqdnek py jgk gks mls olh;r djs ;g fLFkfr loZFkk lansg ds ?ksjs esa gS rFkk olh;r dks xyr fl) dj jgh gS 2011&vkj,yVh&33 esa ikfjr O;oLFkk esa ;g dgk x;k gS fd ;fn olh;r esa fof.kd okfjlksa dks ldkj.k vf/kdkj ls oafpr ugha fd;k x;k gks rks olh;r lansgtud gSA 2004&vkjMh&245 rFkk 2003 & ,vkbZlh ¼8½ esa Hkh ;gh O;oLFkk ekuuh; mPp U;k;ky; iatkc@gfj;k.kk us nh gSA bl rjg olh;r vius vki esa lansgkRed gS vr% olh;r ds vk/kkj ij fouksn dqekj dh vkifRr Lohdkj dj mUgsa okfjl ugha ekuk tk ldrk gS vr% fouksn dh vkifRr fujLr dh tkrh gSA

    vc o`tuanu ds ojklr ds laca/k esa VsdpUnz dh vkifRr dks ns[krs gSa tks fd iathd`r xksnukek ds vk/kkj ij gS mYys[kuh; gS fd jkeknsoh us viuk gd VsdpUnz ds lkFk le>kSrk dj bl i=koyh esa NksM+ fn;k gS vr% i=koyh esa nks i{k cprs gSaA

    vc iathd`r xksnukek ij utj Mkyrs gS ;g xksnukek rhu i`"Bksa esa gS rFkk LVSai dh [kjhn 26-04-1977 dks fd;k x;k ,oa fnukad 27-04-1977 dks xksnukek fy[kk x;k ,oa i`"B 16 ij fnukad 28-04-1977 dks iathd`r fd;k x;kA

    xksnukek esa ;g fy[kk x;k gS fd xksnukek dh jLe fnukad 29-03-1977 dks iwjh dh x;h rFkk blesa VsdpUnz ds firk ckcwjke rFkk mudh ekrk f=os.kh dh lgefr ls xksn fy;k fn;k x;k bl xksnukesa ij o`tuanu ckcwjke rFkk xokgksa lkfyxjke ,oa nqxkZizlkn ds gLrk{kj gSa f=os.kh nsoh ¼ekrk½ dk gLrk{kj xksnukesa ij ugha gSA

    vc lkfyxjke ¼xokg½ ,oa iz/kku ds c;ku dks i<+rs gSa lkfyxjke us vius c;ku esa ;g dgk gS fd xksnukesa ds

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top