SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Del) 1047

TUSHAR RAO GEDELA
Rajeev Kumar – Appellant
Versus
Zile Singh – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Mr. Ajit Nair, Advocate, for the Petitioner..
Mr. Shekhar Prit Jha and Ms. Preeti Kumari, Advocates, for the Respondents.

JUDGMENT

Tushar Rao Gedela, J. (Oral)

[The proceeding has been conducted through Hybrid mode]

1. Petitioner challenges the impugned order dated 30.11.2018 in CS SCJ No. 97558/16 titled as "Zile Singh vs. Ram Kishan", whereby the learned Trial Court has dismissed the application filed by the petitioner and others under Section 151 of the Civil Procedure Code, 1908 (hereinafter referred to as "CPC") for striking off the paragraphs in the amended plaint filed on behalf of respondent/plaintiff consequent to the impleadment of the petitioner herein.

2. Mr. Ajit Nair, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner/defendant No.4 submits that the language of Order 1 Rule 10 CPC is very clear, in that, only the necessary and formal amendments qua the newly added defendant alone is to be permitted to be added by way of an amendment without the necessity of filing an application under Order VI Rule 17 CPC.

3. Having regard to the fact that almost ten paragraphs dedicated to the Will as propounded by one of the defendants, who is the father of the petitioner were sought to be added, does not give the reason to the respondent/plaintiff to add those paragraphs which are not relevant to the issue

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top