ARUN KUMAR SHARMA
Santosh Kumar Agrawal – Appellant
Versus
Vinod Kumar Agrawal – Respondent
JUDGMENT
arun Kumar Sharma, J. - By the instant petition, the petitioner / defendant is questioning the validity of the order dated 28.04.2022 (annexure-P/7) passed by the First additional District Judge Harda, District-Harda (MP) in a pending RCS No.11/2020 whereby, the trial Court dismissed the application filed by the petitioner / plaintiff under Order 6 Rule 17 read with Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, stating that the proposed amendment is not necessary and the same has been filed belatedly.
2. Briefly stated facts of the case are that the petitioner has filed a suit (annexure-P/1) for declaration and permanent injunction on 24.01.2020. The defendant Nos.1 to 7 had filed their written statements (annexure-P/2, P/3 and P/4 respectively). Thereafter, the petitioner had filed an application for amendment in the plaint (annexure-P/5) on 18.04.2022. The defendant Nos.1 to 4 filed reply (annexure-P/6) to the said application. after hearing learned counsel for the parties, the trial Court vide impugned order (annexure-P/7) dated 28.04.2022 dismissed the application filed by the petitioner on the ground that the proposed amendment is not necessary and the said application ha
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.