IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Dinesh Kumar Sharma, J.
Yashpal Gaur & Anr. – Appellants
Versus
State & Anr. – Respondents
Cr.M.C. 7059 of 2022
Decided On : 03-03-2023
Settlement - Matrimonial Dispute - Section 482 Cr. P.C. - 498A/406 IPC - 34 IPC
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner sought quashing of FIR No. 307/2014 registered under Sections 498A/406 IPC. The parties had reached a settlement in which the husband agreed to pay a sum of Rs.4,00,000/- to the wife as a full and final settlement of all claims arising out of the marriage.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the parties had voluntarily entered into an amicable settlement without fear, force, or coercion, and therefore, quashed the FIR and all proceedings emanating from it.
Issues: Quashing of FIR under Sections 498A/406 IPC based on the settlement reached between the parties.
Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized the encouragement of settlements in matrimonial disputes and held that if the parties have reached a mutual settlement voluntarily, without any fear, force, or coercion, it should be accepted.
Final Decision: The court quashed the FIR No. 307/2014 registered under Sections 498A/406/34 IPC and disposed of the petition.
JUDGMENT
Dinesh Kumar Sharma, J. (Oral)
CRL.M.A. 5707/2023 (early hearing) in CRL.M.C. 7059/2022
This is an early application seeking hearing of petition bearing CRL.M.C.7059/2022.
For the reasons stated in the application, the application is allowed.
CRL.M.C. 7059/2022
1. The present petition has been filed under Section 482 Cr. P.C. seeking quashing of FIR No. 307/2014 registered at PS Ashok Vihar under Sections 498A/406 IPC. Chargesheet has also been filed under sections 406/498A/34 IPC.
2. Briefly stated facts of the case are that Respondent No.2/complainant got married to Petitioner No. 1 Yashpal Gaur on 09.02.2011 and remained together with the petitioner till October 2013. One male child namely Master Hardik was born out of this wedlock on 22.06.2012. However, the marriage could not succeed and a mutual divorce petition was filed and decree of divorce was granted vide order dated 20.10.2022 by the learned Principal Judge, Family Court, North West District Rohini, Delhi. She has further stated that during the divorce proceedings, she along with the petitioners have reached into a settlement dated 07.03.2022 at Delhi Mediation Centre, Rohini District Courts, Delhi.
3. The terms and conditions of settlement dated 07.03.2022 reads as follows:
"1) It is mutually settled bet ween the parties that complainant/wife and respondent/husband shall dissolve their marriage by decree of divorce by mutual consent in accordance with law.
2) The respondent/husband shall pay a total amount of Rs.4,00,000/- (Rupees Four Lacs Only) to the complainant/wife as full and final settlement of all her claims arising out of the marriage with respondent/husband which shall include istridhan, permanent alimony, m4intenance (past, present and future) and all other miscellaneous expenses.
3) The settled amount of Rs.4,00,000/- (Rupees Four Lacs Only) shall be paid by way of cash against receipt/DD/RTGS or any other electronic mode by respondent/husband to the complainant/wife as under:
i) The first motion shall be filed jointly by the parties within 30 days from today.
(ii) Rs.2,00,000/- (Rupees Two lacs Only) at the time of recording of statements in the second motion petition before the Ld. Court, which shall be filed by the parties jointly, as per law.
(iii) Rs.2,00,000/- (Rupees two lacs Only) at the time of quashing of FIR mentioned above before Hon'ble High Court of Delhi, New Delhi and the complainant shall co-operate for the same and quashing petition shall be filed within 15 days of decree of divorce.
4) In terms of the present settlement, complaint shall withdraw the present case as well as connected cases mentioned above, after, first motion but before second motion.
5) Both the parties also undertake not to interfere in the life of each other in future.
6) It is settled that if any of the parties back out from the present settlement, another party will have thy right to revive the cases/complaints from their respective original numbers.
7) It is settled that custody of the child shall remain with the mother and father shall have no visitation rights.
8) After compliance of all the terms of the present settlement there shall remain no case/claim/dispute pending between the parties and that none of the parties shall file any fresh civil or criminal proceedings, against each other or their family members in future and that if any other case/petition/complaint etc. between the parties is pending in any Court or Authority either against the parties or against their respective family members and whether it is in the knowledge of other party or not, the same shall be withdrawn/got disposed of by the respective party.
Both the parties have settled the present matter voluntarily without any fear, force, coercion, threat, undue influence or extraneous consideration from any quarter concerned. The parties have undertaken to remain bound by the terms and conditions of the settlement."
4. As per the settlement, her husband/petitioner No.1 has to pay Rs.4,00,000/- to
Encouragement of voluntary settlements in matrimonial disputes and acceptance of such settlements by the court.
The court emphasized the significance of voluntary settlements in matrimonial disputes and applied the provisions of section 13(B) of the Hindu Marriage Act to reach its decision.
Courts should encourage the settlement of matrimonial disputes through amicable settlement, and if the parties have reached a mutual settlement voluntarily without fear, force, or coercion, the same ....
Courts have a duty to encourage genuine settlements of matrimonial disputes and have the inherent power to quash proceedings based on amicable settlements, even if the offences are non-compoundable.
Matrimonial disputes should be put to quietus through genuine settlements, and continuing with the FIR may serve no useful purpose if the parties have amicably resolved their disputes.
The main legal point established is that in matrimonial disputes, genuine settlements should be given importance, and if the parties have amicably resolved their disputes, the cases should be put to ....
Voluntary settlement in matrimonial disputes and the grant of divorce by mutual consent under the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955.
The main legal principle established is the duty of courts to encourage amicable settlements in matrimonial disputes, as emphasized by the Apex Court, leading to the quashing of the case based on the....
Cases arising from matrimonial differences should be put to a quietus if the parties have amicably resolved their disputes.
Matrimonial disputes should be put to rest if the parties have arrived at a genuine settlement and obtained a divorce by mutual consent.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.