IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Dinesh Kumar Sharma, J.
Sh. Manoj Biswas & Anr. – Appellants
Versus
State of NCT of Delhi & Anr. – Respondents
Cr.M.C. 4808 of 2023
Decided On : 17-07-2023
SETTLEMENT - Matrimonial Dispute - Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 - Section 13B(1), Section 13B(2), Section 498A, Section 406, Section 506, Section 34 IPC - CRL.M.C. 4808/2023
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner sought quashing of a case FIR registered under Sections IPC 498A/406/506/34 based on a settlement reached with the respondent, involving dissolution of marriage by mutual consent, payment of settlement amount, and custody arrangements for their child.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the parties had amicably settled the matrimonial dispute and decided to quash the case and its consequent proceedings.
Issues: The main issue was whether the settlement reached between the parties warranted the quashing of the case and its consequent proceedings.
Ratio Decidendi: The court relied on the principles laid down by the Apex Court in B.S. Joshi v. State of Haryana and Yashpal Chaudhrani and Others vs. State (Govt. of NCT Delhi), emphasizing the duty of courts to encourage amicable settlements in matrimonial disputes.
Final Decision: The court quashed the case FIR and its consequent proceedings, disposing of the petition.
JUDGMENT
Dinesh Kumar Sharma, J. (Oral)
CRL.M.A. 18365/2023 (exemption)
Exemption is allowed subject to all just exceptions.
CRL.M.C. 4808/2023
1. The present petition has been filed under Section 482 Cr. PC seeking quashing of case FIR No. 571/2019 registered at PS New Ashok Nagar under Sections IPC 498A/406/506/34 IPC on the basis of settlement.
2. Briefly stated facts of the case are that the petitioner No.1/Husband got married to respondent No.2/Wife on 05.02.2018 according to Hindu Rites, Customs and Ceremony. However, certain temperamental differences and disputes arose between the parties due to which the parties started living separately since 16.06.2019. Out of this wedlock, there is one male child namely Pranav Biswas born on 31.12.2018.
3. Learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that during the pendency of the proceedings the parties have reached at an amicable settlement vide Settlement/Compromise dated 13.03.2023 arrived at Delhi Mediation Centre, Karkardooma Courts, Delhi with the following terms and conditions:
i. It is agreed by the wife and the husband that there is no possibility of reunion due to irreconcilable differences and as such, they have decided to separate their ways and go dissolution of their marriage by mutual consent in accordance with law as provided under section 13B of Hindu Marriage Act, 1955.
ii. It is agreed between the wife and the husband that they shall file the first motion petition under section 13B(1) of Hindu Marriage Act for dissolution of marriage by way of mutual consent on or before 31.03.2023 and the expenses for the same shall be borne by the parties.
iii. It is further agreed between the wife and the husband that second motion petition under section 13B(2) of the Hindu Marriage Act shall be filed at the expiry of statutory period of six months from the date of disposal of the petition under Section 13B(1) of the Hindu Marriage Act. However, the parties are at liberty to move appropriate application for waiver of mandatory period of six months, if they so desire.
iv. It is further agreed between the parties that the husband shall pay an amount of Rs.3,00,000/- (Rs. Three Lakhs only) to the wife towards full and final settlement of all her matrimonial disputes including maintenance (past, present and future), permanent alimony. jewellery, istridhan. compensation etc. and the wife undertakes not to put forth any further claim towards the same in future at any stage.
v. It is agreed between the parties that the husband shall pay the above-said settled amount to the wife by way of DD in the name of 'Jyoti Mandal' as per the following schedule:
| S.No. | Amount | Date |
| 1. | Rs.60,000/- (Rs. Sixty Thousand only) | At the time of recording of statement of the parties in the first motion petition under Section 13-B(1) of Hindu Marriage Act. |
| 2. | Rs. 1,30,000/- (Rs. One Lakh Thirty Thousand only) | At the time of recording of statement of the parties in the second motion petition under section 13-B(2) of Hindu Marriage Act. |
| 3. | Rs.1,10,000/- (Rs. One Lakh Ten Thousand only) | At the time of quashing of the FIR before Hon'ble High Court |
vii. It has been further agreed between the parties that the minor child would be free to have recourse to the provisions of law for seeking appropriate relief from the Court in relation to the aspect of maintenance, education and up-bringing etc in terms of the pronouncement of judgment of the Hon'ble High Court in the case titled "Rakesh Jain & Ors, v Sarita Gupta (Crl.Misc No.2935/2019).
viii. It is further agreed between the parties that on completion of terms agreed above, they shall not be left with any claims towards each other and shall not litigate in future against each other qua this marriage.
ix. It is further agreed that either of parties to the settle
Courts should encourage amicable settlements in matrimonial disputes and may quash related proceedings if the parties have voluntarily settled the matter.
Courts have a duty to encourage amicable settlements in matrimonial disputes, and if parties have voluntarily settled the matter without coercion, the court may quash related proceedings.
Voluntary settlement in matrimonial disputes and the grant of divorce by mutual consent under the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955.
The court emphasized the significance of voluntary settlements in matrimonial disputes and applied the provisions of section 13(B) of the Hindu Marriage Act to reach its decision.
Matrimonial disputes should be put to quietus through genuine settlements, and continuing with the FIR may serve no useful purpose if the parties have amicably resolved their disputes.
Courts can quash non-compoundable offences arising from matrimonial disputes if parties have reached an amicable settlement, exercising inherent powers under section 482 of the Code.
The main legal point established is that in matrimonial disputes, genuine settlements should be given importance, and if the parties have amicably resolved their disputes, the cases should be put to ....
Courts have a duty to encourage amicable settlements in matrimonial disputes.
The duty of courts to encourage amicable settlements in matrimonial disputes and the need for proper drafting of settlement deeds.
Encouragement of voluntary settlements in matrimonial disputes and acceptance of such settlements by the court.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.