IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Mukta Gupta, Poonam A. Bamba, JJ.
Deepak Alias Raj – Appellant
Versus
State of NCT of Delhi – Respondent
Cr.A. 504 of 2018
Decided On : 10-03-2023
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. facts establishing the context of the case. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. arguments presented by the appellant's counsel regarding circumstantial evidence. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 3. prosecution's response highlighting corroborating witness testimonies. (Para 6) |
| 4. court observations on witness credibility and evidence. (Para 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 5. witness accounts detailing the last seen evidence of the deceased. (Para 11 , 12) |
| 6. testimonies related to the discovery and forensic evidence. (Para 13 , 14) |
| 7. police investigative procedures and testimonies supporting evidence. (Para 15) |
| 8. statements from liquor shop managers regarding purchases linked to the accused. (Para 16) |
| 9. cumulative evidence establishing last seen theory and connection to death. (Para 17) |
| 10. medical and forensic findings linking injuries and alcohol to the case. (Para 18) |
| 11. defendant’s failure to provide explanation for the death leads to inference. (Para 19) |
| 12. dna evidence links the appellant to the crime. (Para 20) |
| 13. concerns about integrity of evidence handling. (Para 21) |
| 14. commentary on the implausibility of defense claims. (Para 22 , 23) |
| 15. judgment affirms the conviction. (Para 24) |
| 16. final dismissal of appeal and orders on judgment. (Para 25 , 26) |
JUDGMENT
Poonam A. Bamba, J. Vide this appeal, the appellant assails the judgment dated 23.02.2018 passed by Ld. ASJ-04 (East), Karkardooma Courts, Delhi, ("impugned judgment" in short), convicting the appellant/accused in FIR no. 292/2013, PS Mayur Vihar, u/Ss. 302/34 IPC and order on sentence dated 27.02.2018, whereby the appellant was sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for life under Section 302 IPC with fine of Rs.10,000/-, in default to undergo simple imprisonment for a period of six months.
2. Briefly stating, the prosecution case is that on 23.08.2013, while on patrolling duty in his beat area, when HC Subhash/PW-18 along with Const. Satender/PW-16 reached Chilla Bagh behind Star City Mall at about 06.15 pm, they found a dead body of a male person near the wall. HC Subhash/PW-18 conveyed this information from his mobile phone to PS Mayur Vihar, which was recorded vide DD No. 34A/Ex.PW23/A and was conveyed to SHO Insp. Vivekanand Jha/PW-23/Investigation Officer (`IO' in short) through wireless. PW-23, who was also on patrolling duty, reached the spot along with his staff and in the meanwhile SI Mausam Ghani/PW-6 also reached the spot on receipt of the call vide DD No. 34A. IO/PW-23 called the Crime Team which inspected the spot and took photographs of the scene of crime. IO collected the samples and seized the incriminating material lying around the spot. Thereafter, the dead body was removed to LBS Hospital, where after examination, he was declared brought dead and the body was sent for post-mortem. In the meanwhile, Sh. Om Prakash/PW-2, father of the deceased came to the hospital along with his other son Rinku/PW-4, searching for his missing son. PW-2 identified the body as that of his son Ravi @ Chottu. IO recorded the statement of Sh. Om Prakash/PW-2 i.e. PW-2/A and made his endorsement/Ex.PW-23/C on the same and got the FIR Ex. PW-8/A registered u/S. 302/34 IPC.
2.1. The complainant Om Prakash/PW-2 in his statement/complaint Ex. PW-2/A stated that on 22.08.2013 at about 06.30 pm, the appellant/accused Deepak, JCL-P, JCL-S and JCL-R (being juveniles in conflict with law, their names withheld) had come in his gali and JCL-P called his deceased son Ravi @ Chottu; the deceased went along with them but did not return thereafter. He also stated that on inquiry, the family members of the appellant/accused and three JCLs informed him that they had also not returned to their houses. When the deceased did not return till the next morning, the complainant inquired from the father of JCL-P, who informed that JCL-P has also not returned home. Worried about well being of his son, the complainant/PW-2 went to PS Mayur Vihar, where he was informed that dead body of one Ravi was found behind Star City Mall which has be
In circumstantial murder cases, last seen theory alone cannot sustain conviction without complete evidentiary chain excluding innocence, especially with wide time gap allowing third-party interventio....
The court emphasized that circumstantial evidence must establish a complete and unbroken chain of guilt beyond reasonable doubt, particularly in capital cases.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.