SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Del) 1190

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Mukta Gupta, Poonam A. Bamba, JJ.
Deepak Alias Raj – Appellant
Versus
State of NCT of Delhi – Respondent
Cr.A. 504 of 2018
Decided On : 10-03-2023

Advocates appeared:
Mr. Kanhaiya Singhal, Ms. Priyal Garg, Mr. Prasand, Mr. Chetan Bhardwaj,Mr. Udit Bhardwaj and Mr. Ajay Kumar, Advocates, for the Appellant.
Mr.Laksh Khanna, APP, for the State with Ins. Sanjeev Kumar Verma, SHO, PS Mayur Vihar.

Headnote:(A) Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Sections 302 and 34 - Life imprisonment awarded to the appellant for the murder of the deceased after thorough investigation established circumstantial evidence pointing towards guilt - Appellant was convicted based on testimonies from multiple witnesses, forensic evidence including DNA matching, and the principle of 'last seen' - The prosecution case relied on the actions taken post the discovery of the deceased's body, leading to the appellant's arrest and recovery of incriminating materials - Appeared plausible that the appellant and juvenile accomplices had influenced the deceased's consumption of alcohol leading to eventual death - Convictions upheld despite the defense claiming false implication. (Paras 1-26)

(B) Evidence and Standard of Proof - Circumstantial evidence must establish a complete chain that points to the sole conclusion of guilt without leaving any reasonable doubt - The court emphasized that the presence of DNA evidence linking the appellant to the crime was crucial in affirming this standard in circumstantial cases. (Paras 19-24)

(C) Criminal Appeals - The appellate court's role is to determine whether the trial court's judgment suffers from any legal infirmities or is influenced by wrongful conclusions based on evidence presented. (Para 25)

Table of Content
1. facts establishing the context of the case. (Para 1 , 2)
2. arguments presented by the appellant's counsel regarding circumstantial evidence. (Para 4 , 5)
3. prosecution's response highlighting corroborating witness testimonies. (Para 6)
4. court observations on witness credibility and evidence. (Para 8 , 9 , 10)
5. witness accounts detailing the last seen evidence of the deceased. (Para 11 , 12)
6. testimonies related to the discovery and forensic evidence. (Para 13 , 14)
7. police investigative procedures and testimonies supporting evidence. (Para 15)
8. statements from liquor shop managers regarding purchases linked to the accused. (Para 16)
9. cumulative evidence establishing last seen theory and connection to death. (Para 17)
10. medical and forensic findings linking injuries and alcohol to the case. (Para 18)
11. defendant’s failure to provide explanation for the death leads to inference. (Para 19)
12. dna evidence links the appellant to the crime. (Para 20)
13. concerns about integrity of evidence handling. (Para 21)
14. commentary on the implausibility of defense claims. (Para 22 , 23)
15. judgment affirms the conviction. (Para 24)
16. final dismissal of appeal and orders on judgment. (Para 25 , 26)

JUDGMENT

Poonam A. Bamba, J. Vide this appeal, the appellant assails the judgment dated 23.02.2018 passed by Ld. ASJ-04 (East), Karkardooma Courts, Delhi, ("impugned judgment" in short), convicting the appellant/accused in FIR no. 292/2013, PS Mayur Vihar, u/Ss. 302/34 IPC and order on sentence dated 27.02.2018, whereby the appellant was sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for life under Section 302 IPC with fine of Rs.10,000/-, in default to undergo simple imprisonment for a period of six months.

2. Briefly stating, the prosecution case is that on 23.08.2013, while on patrolling duty in his beat area, when HC Subhash/PW-18 along with Const. Satender/PW-16 reached Chilla Bagh behind Star City Mall at about 06.15 pm, they found a dead body of a male person near the wall. HC Subhash/PW-18 conveyed this information from his mobile phone to PS Mayur Vihar, which was recorded vide DD No. 34A/Ex.PW23/A and was conveyed to SHO Insp. Vivekanand Jha/PW-23/Investigation Officer (`IO' in short) through wireless. PW-23, who was also on patrolling duty, reached the spot along with his staff and in the meanwhile SI Mausam Ghani/PW-6 also reached the spot on receipt of the call vide DD No. 34A. IO/PW-23 called the Crime Team which inspected the spot and took photographs of the scene of crime. IO collected the samples and seized the incriminating material lying around the spot. Thereafter, the dead body was removed to LBS Hospital, where after examination, he was declared brought dead and the body was sent for post-mortem. In the meanwhile, Sh. Om Prakash/PW-2, father of the deceased came to the hospital along with his other son Rinku/PW-4, searching for his missing son. PW-2 identified the body as that of his son Ravi @ Chottu. IO recorded the statement of Sh. Om Prakash/PW-2 i.e. PW-2/A and made his endorsement/Ex.PW-23/C on the same and got the FIR Ex. PW-8/A registered u/S. 302/34 IPC.

2.1. The complainant Om Prakash/PW-2 in his statement/complaint Ex. PW-2/A stated that on 22.08.2013 at about 06.30 pm, the appellant/accused Deepak, JCL-P, JCL-S and JCL-R (being juveniles in conflict with law, their names withheld) had come in his gali and JCL-P called his deceased son Ravi @ Chottu; the deceased went along with them but did not return thereafter. He also stated that on inquiry, the family members of the appellant/accused and three JCLs informed him that they had also not returned to their houses. When the deceased did not return till the next morning, the complainant inquired from the father of JCL-P, who informed that JCL-P has also not returned home. Worried about well being of his son, the complainant/PW-2 went to PS Mayur Vihar, where he was informed that dead body of one Ravi was found behind Star City Mall which has be

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top