IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Dinesh Kumar Sharma, J.
Amit @ Rahul – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent
Bail Appln. 3158 of 2022
Decided On : 13-03-2023
BAIL - Grant of Bail in FIR no.387/2022 under Sections 307 IPC - 25/27 of Arms Act - [IPC Section 307, Arms Act Sections 25/27] - The court considered the peculiar facts and circumstances of the case, the criminal antecedents of the accused, and the severity of the accusation. It noted the lack of previous enmity and motive, and the accidental nature of the injury caused to the complainant. The court granted bail to the petitioner with specific conditions.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner filed for bail in a case involving FIR no.387/2022 under Sections 307 IPC and 25/27 of Arms Act. The complainant alleged that the petitioner, along with his friend, had fired upon them, resulting in injuries.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the petitioner had been in custody for nine months, and considering the lack of previous enmity and motive, granted bail with specific conditions.
Issues: The issues involved the severity of the accusation, the criminal antecedents of the accused, and the peculiar facts and circumstances of the case.
Ratio Decidendi: The court considered the parameters for grant of bail as established in Kalyan Chandra Sarkar v. Rajesh Ranjan @ Pappu Yadav and Anr., and emphasized the need to examine the nature of the accusation, the severity of punishment, and the supporting evidence.
Final Decision: The petitioner was granted bail on furnishing a personal bond and surety, subject to specific conditions.
JUDGMENT
Dinesh Kumar Sharma, J. (Oral)--Present application has been filed for grant of bail in FIR no.387/2022 under Sections 307 IPC. Chargresheet has also been filed under section 307 IPC and 25/27 of Arms Act registered at PS Bhajanpura, Delhi.
2. Mr.Ramesh Gupta, learned senior counsel submits that initially FIR no.380/2022 was lodged on 05.05.2022 on the statement of Deepak. In the said FIR, complainant Deepak had alleged that his brother Vishal had suffered fire arm injury and had been admitted in the hospital. Injured Vishal had stated that he was going along with his friend Amit to meet the common friend Sonu. It was further alleged that while they were going towards Gamri from Burari, he was driving the car while Amit was sitting on the passenger seat, at around 5.30 p.m. when they reached near mother dairy booth on Panchwa Pushta, a black colour Thar came from the opposite direction and parked the same in front of the complainant's car. The complainant stated that the registration number of the vehicle was DL 8C AX 1777 and it was being driven by Manish s/o Harmesh Kumar of Gamri Village. He stated that Manish got down from Thar along with his friend and starting firing upon him. Vishal stated that he suffered several gun shot injuries and thereafter he was taken to the hospital. During this incident, the complainant Gaurav Sharma, who was going along with his wife in DL 2F 0007 reached on Gamri Road near Panchwa Pushta. Gaurav alleged that at that time, traffic was slow and a black colour Thar crossed his vehicle. He further stated that suddenly a young boy who was around 28-30 years old came with a pistol and started firing indiscriminately on them and he suffered gun-shot injury on his left hand. On the statement of said Gaurav Sharma FIR no.387/2022 was lodged.
3. Mr.Ramesh Gupta, learned senior counsel submits that the accused is in custody since 26.05.2022. The injury suffered by the complainant was on the right hand and he was discharged from the hospital on 07.05.2022. Learned senior counsel submits that trial may take a long time and therefore the petitioner may be admitted to bail.
4. Learned APP has vehemently opposed the bail application and has submitted that it is a very serious case where in the broad day light, the petitioner was making random fire and a common citizen suffered an injury. Learned APP submits that such kind of incident spreads fear and panic in the minds of the people. It has been submitted that present petitioner has many previous involvements in the serious cases of nature such as extortion, murder, attempt to murder etc. in Uttar Pradesh. Learned APP submits that therefore, the petitioner may not be released on bail.
5. The jurisprudence for grant of bail is very well settled. The court while granting bail in the serious cases has to see the peculiar facts and circumstances of each case. The court has to take into account the criminal antecedents of the accused but has to primarily confine to the merits of the case in which the accused has been arrested. The parameters of grant of bail is very well settled in Kalyan Chandra Sarkar v. Rajesh Ranjan @ Pappu Yadav and Anr., (2004 (7) SCC 528) In para 11 wherein it is stated that "11. The law in regard to grant or refusal of bail is very well settled. The court granting bail should exercise its discretion in a judicious manner and not as a matter of course. Though at the stage of granting bail a detailed examination of evidence and elaborate documentation of the merit of the case need not be undertaken, there is a need to indicate in such orders reasons for prima facie concluding why bail was being granted particularly where the accused is charged of having committed a serious offence. Any order devoid of such reasons would suffer from non-application of mind. It is also necessary for the court granting bail to consider among other circumstances, the following factors also before granting bail; they are:
(a) The nature of accusation
The court emphasized the need to consider the peculiar facts and circumstances of the case, the severity of the accusation, and the criminal antecedents of the accused in granting bail.
The basic rule of the criminal justice system is bail and not jail, and the denial of bail amounts to deprivation of personal liberty.
The decision to grant bail was influenced by the absence of injuries, the petitioner's prolonged custody, and the unlikelihood of the trial concluding soon.
The court established that the severity of injuries and the duration of the trial are critical factors in determining the grant of bail under Section 439 Cr.P.C.
Long incarceration does not warrant bail in serious offences like murder when credible evidence and specific allegations against the accused exist.
The central legal point established in the judgment is that the absence of injuries to vital body parts, non-life-threatening injuries, and the expected lengthy trial period can be considered in gran....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.