SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(P&H) 1111

HARNARESH SINGH GILL
Manjeet @ Gallo – Appellant
Versus
State Of Haryana – Respondent


Advocates:
Mr. Rajender Singh Malik, Advocate, ; for the Petitioner.; Mr. Surender Singh, Aag, Haryana.

JUDGMENT

Harnaresh Singh Gill , J. (Oral) - Through this second petition, the petitioner seeks regular bail in case bearing FIR No. 484 dated 17.08.2021, registered at Police Station Rai Sonipat, District Sonipat, under Sections 307 and 34 IPC and Section 25 of the Arms Act, 1959.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that allegations against the petitioner are that he fired gun-shots upon the complainant party which had hit the window glass(es) and other places of the car of the complainant; that it is a case of no injury; that the petitioner has been in custody since 24.08.2021, and that so far as other cases registered against the petitioner, are concerned, he stands released on bail therein.

3. On the other hand, learned State counsel, while opposing the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, submits that the petitioner had fired at the complainant and his companions with an intention to kill them.

4. I have heard the learned counsel for the parties.

5. The challan stands presented. It is a case of no injury. Out of 16 prosecution witnesses, none has been examined so far. The petitioner has been in custody since 24.08.2021. Trial is unlikely to conclude

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top