IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Dinesh Kumar Sharma, J.
Samir Siddiqui & Ors. – Appellants
Versus
The State Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Anr. – Respondents
Cr.M.C. 3462 of 2022
Decided On : 15-03-2023
settled - Matrimonial Dispute - Section 379 IPC - [Section 379 IPC, Section 482 Cr.P.C.] - The court quashed the FIR and related proceedings under Section 379 IPC based on an amicable settlement between the parties in a matrimonial dispute, invoking the inherent power under Section 482 Cr.P.C. The court emphasized the duty to encourage amicable settlements in matrimonial disputes, citing relevant case law.
Fact of the Case:
An FIR was lodged under Section 379 IPC based on allegations related to a matrimonial dispute. The parties entered into a settlement, including specific terms regarding the quashing of the FIR and related proceedings.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the parties had voluntarily settled the matter without fear, force, or coercion, and decided to quash the proceedings based on the settlement.
Issues: The main issue was whether the court should quash the FIR and related proceedings based on the amicable settlement between the parties in a matrimonial dispute.
Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized the duty to encourage amicable settlements in matrimonial disputes and invoked the inherent power under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to quash the proceedings based on the settlement.
Final Decision: The court quashed the FIR no.618/2022 registered under Section 379 IPC at PS Geeta Colony along with all the other proceedings emanating therefrom.
JUDGMENT
Dinesh Kumar Sharma, J. (Oral)--The present petition has been filed for quashing FIR no.618/2022 registered under Section 379 IPC at PS Geeta Colony.
2. Briefly stated facts of the case are that an FIR was lodged on the statement of Respondent No.2 alleging therein that at the time of her marriage, her family had gifted her an I-20 Car but the petitioners ran away from flat no. 301, Taj Enclave and also took the car with them alongwith her other material. On this complaint FIR no.618/2022 under section 379 IPC was lodged.
3. Today, petitioner no.1 in person and respondent no.2 (through video conferencing) have appeared. Respondent no.2 states that now she has entered into as settlement. The Memo of Understanding dated 24.07.2022 has been executed between the parties. Perusal of MOU indicates that there are other cases pending between the parties. The relevant terms of the MOU are reproduced as under:
"10. It is further agreed that the second party shall cooperate with the first party and his family members in getting the FIR bearing No.618/22 PS Geeta Colony u/S 379 IPC, quashed before the Hon'ble High Court of Delhi and shall also give supporting affidavit to be filed alongwith the petition u/s 482 Cr.P.C. on 25.07.2022 before the Oath Commissioner in the premises of Hon'ble High Court of Delhi at New Delhi."
11. It is undertaken by the first party that he shall handover the i20 Sports car Red Color Hyundai bearing number plate DL-9CM-7573 purchased on 29.11.2014 and Honda CBZ bike Black Color, kept in the stilled parking of M Block, Taj Enclave, Geeta Colony, Delhi-110031 purchased in the year 2007, after' completion of proceedings before Darul Qaza, which was given by the family of the Second Party to the First Party. It is further undertaken by the First Party that the above mentioned vehicles have not been involved in any illegal activity and or has no outstanding penalty, if found otherwise, the first party shall be held responsible and shall make good the losses to the second party.
12. It is agreed, undertaken and decided between both the Parties that apart from the above mentioned complaint(s)/suit(s)/proceeding(s)/claim(s), if there are any other complaint(s)/suit,(s)/proceeding(s)/claim(s), filed by either of the ' Parties against each other and/or their family members, shall also' be withdrawn."
13. It is agreed, undertaken and decided by both the Parties that apart from what has been mentioned in 'Annexure A and B', the Second Party is not entitled to anything else from the First party and his family members. It has been explicitly agreed between the parties that this shall be considered as the full and final settlement (past, present & future). That after the signing of the present MOU, the Second party shall be left with no claim towards alimony, maintenance, dowry, istridhan or jewellery (past, present or future), and there is no alimony to be given to the Second Party by the First Party.
18. It is agreed and undertaken by both the Parties that they will co-operate with each other for hassle-free giving and taking of articles in Delhi as per 'Annexure A and B'. It is further agreed that the Second Party shall pay a sum of Rs.1,89,500/- by way of cheque bearing No.000064 drawn on HDFC Bank, from her account No.50100114142650 in favour of the First Party and assures that the cheque is good for encashment, however, the First Party shall present the same only after the quashing of E-FIR No. 618/2022 u/s 379 IPC, e-Police Station Geeta Colony, New Delhi. It is further agreed that the First Party shall also pay a sum of Rs.63,500/- by way of cheque bearing No.078916 drawn on SBI Bank, from his account No.31986924634 in favour of the Second Party and assures that the cheque is good for encashment, however, the Second Party shall present the same only after the quashing of E-FIR No. 618/2022 u/S 379 IPC, e-Police Station Geeta Colony, New Delhi."
4. Learned APP submits that as per instructions of IO an untraced r
Courts have a duty to encourage amicable settlements in matrimonial disputes and may quash proceedings based on settlements using inherent powers under Section 482 Cr.P.C.
The power of the High Courts to quash FIRs, the nature of offences that can be quashed based on compromise, and the influence of previous judgments on the court's decision.
The court's decision established the principle that FIRs in matrimonial disputes can be quashed based on amicable settlements between the parties, and that the nature of the offences and settlement a....
A voluntary settlement reached through mediation between parties serves as a basis for quashing criminal proceedings under IPC sections related to matrimonial disputes.
The importance of amicable settlements in matrimonial disputes and the court's power to quash proceedings under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code.
Courts have a duty to encourage genuine settlements of matrimonial disputes and have the inherent power to quash proceedings based on amicable settlements, even if the offences are non-compoundable.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the court's authority to quash non-compoundable offences under section 482 of the Code, considering the nature of the offence and the amicable sett....
The central legal point established is the court's authority to quash criminal proceedings in matrimonial disputes based on genuine settlements, as supported by legal precedents.
The main legal point established is that the inherent powers under section 482 of the Code can be exercised to quash non-compoundable offenses after considering the nature of the offense and the amic....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.