Back
MANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORA
Rajinder Bhardwaj Deceased Through Lrs) – Appellant
Versus
Vijay Kumar Kaushik – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Manmeet Pritam Singh Arora, J.
1. The present revision petition has been filed by the Petitioner, tenant, assailing the eviction order dated 27.11.2018, passed by CCJ acting as Additional Rent Controller, Pilot Court (Central District), Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi ('Trial Court'), in eviction petition bearing No. E-46/18, whereby the Petitioner, tenant's, application seeking leave to defend was dismissed and an eviction order was passed in favour of the Respondents, landlords, with respect to tenanted premises being two shops situated at ground floor of property bearing no. 10332-33, Mandir Mangla Devi @ Mandir Mansa Devi, Pul Mithai, Library Road, Ward No. XII, Azad Market, Delhi - 06 ('tenanted premises').
2. Brief facts as stated by the Respondents, landlords, in the eviction petition are as under:
2.1. It is stated that initially the property bearing no. 10332-33, Mandir Mangla Devi @ Mandir Mansa Devi, Pul Mithai, Library Road, Ward No. XII, Azad Market, Delhi - 06 ('subject property'), ad-measuring 670 sq. yds., was owned by Pandit Udey Ram, who was also the pujari of Mandir Maa Mangla Devi @Mansa Devi.
2.2. It is stated that Sh. Khazan Singh Kaushik, father of the Res
The main legal point established in the judgment is the importance of presenting consistent and corroborated evidence to support claims in eviction cases, and the rejection of contradictory claims su....
Tenancy and Land laws - Eviction - There is nothing that petitioners have been able to bring forth to indicate that finding has been arrived at by a misreading of facts or omitting relevant evidence ....
A tenant cannot dispute the title of the landlord, and genuine need for premises must be established without alternative accommodation for eviction to be warranted. Adverse possession claims require ....
The legal heirs of the recorded owners of the subject property are entitled to maintain an eviction petition under the Delhi Rent Control Act, establishing the landlord-tenant relationship.
The central legal point established in the judgment is the interpretation and application of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1968, specifically Section 14(1)(a) and (j) to determine the existence of the ....
The legal point established is that the landlord retains ownership rights until physical possession is taken over by the government, and the burden is on the tenant to show how they came into possess....
The Trial Court had the jurisdiction to adjudicate the claim of the Petitioners with respect to alleged ownership of the tenanted premises on the basis of unregistered Will, and the non-filing of a p....
A tenant denying a landlord's ownership must vacate the property and pursue separate legal action to establish title, reinforcing the court's ruling that the ejectment suit was valid.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the Plaintiff must prove the relationship of landlord and tenant to be entitled to the reliefs sought in an eviction suit.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
