Back
2023 Supreme(Del) 878
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Suresh Kumar Kait, Neena Bansal Krishna, JJ.
Satyendra Kumar Bind – Appellant
Versus
Union of India & Ors. – Respondents
W.P.(C) 2934 of 2023
Decided On : 20-03-2023
Important Points
Subject
Administrative Law - Mandamus
Headnote
Mandamus - Statutory Petition - Adjudication under BSF Act, 1968
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner sought a writ of mandamus to direct the respondent DG BSF to adjudicate a post-confirmation statutory petition under Section 117(2) of the BSF Act, 1968 read with Rule 167 of the BSF Rules, 1969. The petition had been pending for over four months without adjudication.
Finding of the Court:
The court directed the respondent No. 2 to decide the post-confirmation statutory petition of the petitioner within four weeks and communicate the decision to the petitioner within one week thereafter.
Issues: Delay in adjudication of post-confirmation statutory petition under BSF Act, 1968
Ratio Decidendi: The court found that the delay in adjudicating the petition was unreasonable and directed the respondent to decide the petition within a specified time frame.
Final Decision: The court disposed of the petition by directing the respondent to adjudicate the post-confirmation statutory petition within four weeks and communicate the decision to the petitioner within one week thereafter.
Mr. Abhay Kumar Bhargava & Mr. Satyarth S, Advocates, for the Petitioner.
Mr. Nitinjya Chaudhary, Senior Panel Counsel with Ms. Jheepa, Govt. Pleader for UOI & Mr. Hemendra Singh, DC (Law) BSF.
JUDGMENT (Oral)
1. Vide the present petition, the petitioner is seeking following reliefs:
"a.) Issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction, thereby directing the respondent DG BSF, to adjudicate the post-confirmation statutory petition dated 29.10.2022 preferred under Section 117(2) of the BSF Act, 1968 R/w Rule 167 of the BSF Rules, 1969 before the in a time bound manner."
2. Learned counsel on behalf of the petitioner submits that post-confirmation statutory petition dated 29.10.2022 under Section 117(2) of the BSF Act, 1968 read with Rule 167 of the BSF Rules, 1969 has been preferred by the petitioner against the findings and sentence of the General Security Force Court held from 14.03.2022 to 22.04.2022 and the Orders of Confirmation and Promulgation dated 27.07.2022 and 30.07.2022 respectively.
3. It may be noted that despite a lapse of more than four months, the said post-confirmation statutory petition dated 29.10.2022 has not been adjudicated by the respondent No. 2/Director General, BSF.
4. Learned counsel on behalf of the respondents submits that a number of such petitions are pending with the respondent No. 2 due to the reason that the Director General, Central Reserve Police Force has been given the additional charge of Director General, Border Security Force/respondent No. 2.
5. Accordingly, we hereby dispose of the present petition directing the respondent No. 2 to decide the said post-confirmation statutory petition of the petitioner within four weeks from today.
6. The decision, so taken, shall be communicated to the petitioner in writing within one week thereafter.
7. Accordingly, the present petition is disposed of.
