SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Del) 5524

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Sanjeev Sachdeva, Manoj Jain, JJ.
Shantanu Saha - Appellant
Versus
Union of India & Ors. - Respondents
W.P.(C) 16291 of 2023& CM APPLS. 65609-10 of 2023
Decided On : 18-12-2023

Advocates appeared:
Mr. Arjun Panwar, Advocate, for the Petitioner.
Mr. Ripu Daman Bhardwaj, Central Government Standing Counsel, for the Respondent.

IMPORTANT POINT
The court has the authority to direct the Competent Authority to expedite the disposal of petitions and consider requests for suspension of sentence in accordance with the law.

Headnote:

Direction - Disposal of Post Confirmation Petition - The court directed the Competent Authority to dispose of the Post Confirmation Petition filed by the petitioner within two weeks and consider the request for suspension of sentence in accordance with the law.

Fact of the Case:

The petitioner sought a direction for the disposal of the Post Confirmation Petition filed under Section 117(2) of the Border Security Force Act, 1968, as the petitioner had already undergone nine months of incarceration against the one-year sentence.

Finding of the Court:

The court directed the Competent Authority to dispose of the Post Confirmation Petition within two weeks and consider the request for suspension of sentence in accordance with the law.

Issues: The issue was the delay in the disposal of the Post Confirmation Petition and the petitioner's request for suspension of sentence.

Ratio Decidendi: The court found that the petitioner had already undergone a significant portion of the sentence and directed the Competent Authority to expedite the disposal of the petition and consider the request for suspension of sentence.

Final Decision: The petition was disposed of with a direction to the Competent Authority to decide the Post Confirmation Petition within two weeks and consider the request for suspension of sentence.

JUDGMENT

Sanjeev Sachdeva, J. (Oral)

1. Petitioner seeks a direction to the respondents to dispose of the Post Confirmation Petition filed by the petitioner on 23.10.2023 under Section 117 (2) of the Border Security Force Act, 1968.

2. Learned counsel for petitioner submits that petitioner has already undergone nearly nine months of incarceration as against the sentence of one year.

3. Issue notice. Notice is accepted by learned counsel appearing for the respondents.

4. Learned counsel for respondents submits that Post Confirmation Petition is pending consideration before the Competent Authority and assures that the same shall be disposed of within a period of two weeks from today.

5. In view of the above, petition is disposed of, directing the Competent Authority to decide the Post Confirmation Petition filed by the petitioner within a period of two weeks from today. The Competent Authority shall also consider the request of the petitioner for suspension of sentence in accordance with law.

6. Petition is disposed of in the above terms.

7. It would be open to the petitioner to avail of such other additional remedy as may be available in law.

8. Order dasti under the signature of Court Master.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top