SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Del) 4206

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Suresh Kumar Kait, Neena Bansal Krishna, JJ.
Asst Comdt Javed Ali – Appellant
Versus
Union of India & Ors. – Respondents
W.P.(C) 7017 of 2023, CM APPL. 27332-33 of 2023
Decided On : 22-05-2023

Advocates appeared:
Mr. Ajit Kakkar and Mr. Ankit Negi, Advocates, for the Petitioner.
Mr. Neeraj, Senior Panel Counsel with Mr. Vedansh Anand, GP, Mr. Rudra Paliwal, Mr. Sahaj Garg and Mr. Deepanshu Badiwal, Advocates with Mr. Hemendra Singh, DC (Law), BSF, for the Respondents.

The court has the authority to direct the respondent to decide on petitions for suspension of sentence within specified timelines, especially when rigorous imprisonment is involved.

Headnote:

Suspension of Sentence - Criminal Procedure - The court directed the respondent to decide the pre-confirmation petition and the application for suspension of sentence within specified timelines, considering the rigorous imprisonment awarded to the petitioner.

Fact of the Case:

The petitioner sought suspension of sentence and copies of GSFC proceedings, and alternative relief under the BSF Act.

Finding of the Court:

The court directed the respondent to decide the pre-confirmation petition and the application for suspension of sentence within specified timelines.

Issues: Prayer for suspension of sentence and copies of GSFC proceedings, and alternative relief under the BSF Act.

Ratio Decidendi: Considering the rigorous imprisonment awarded to the petitioner, the court directed the respondent to decide the petitions within specified timelines.

Final Decision: The present petition and pending applications stand disposed of with the directions given to the respondent.

JUDGMENT (Oral)

1. Vide the present petition, petitioner is praying as under:

    "a) To Pass an order of suspension of sentence of the petitioner and direct the respondents for releasing the petitioner under the provisions of section 389 Cr.P.C.;

    b) To direct the Respondents to provide the copies of GSFC proceedings of the Petitioner;

    c) Alternatively, to direct the Respondent No. 2 to Dispose of the Petition filed under section 130 of BSF Act dated 08.05.2023, preferred on behalf of the Petitioner;

    d) To grant two weeks' time to approach the court for suspension of sentence in case of rejection of petition of section 130 of BSF Act and no coercive action may be taken against petitioner;"

2. Learned counsel for respondents, who is appearing on advance notice, has assured this Court that pre-confirmation petition dated 11.04.2023 preferred by the petitioner shall be decided within four weeks.

3. Keeping in view the averments made in the present petition and the fact that the sentence awarded to petitioner is rigorous imprisonment for one year, therefore, we hereby direct the respondent concerned to decide the pre- confirmation petition dated 11.04.2023 within three weeks from today and thereafter, decide the application of petitioner for suspension of sentence dated 08.05.2023 within two weeks.

4. With the aforesaid directions, the present petition and pending applications stand disposed of.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top