Back
SURESH KUMAR KAIT, NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA
Sandeep Kumar – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
JUDGMENT (Oral)
1. Vide the present petition, the petitioners are seeking following reliefs:
"a.) Issue a Mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction thereby directing the respondents to carry out the exercise initiated by the Org. Branch of CRPF vide UO dated 12/07/2019 for restoration of 200 posts which were abolished vide GoI/MHA letter dated 18/06/2019 as mentioned in Annexure P-15 which is pending before ADG (Medical) CAPFs from 04/09/2020 in a time bound manner.
b.) Issue a writ of Certiorari or any other appropriate writ, order or direction thereby calling for records of the impugned order dated 18.06.2019 and quash the same."
2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that pursuant to the directions passed vide Judgement dated 01.02.2023 in W.P.(C) 1257/2023 titled Sandeep Kumar & Anr. vs. Union of India And Ors., the Board of Officer was constituted vide Medical Dte Signal No. O.IV-2/2023-Med-II dated 14.02.2023 to take a final decision on the Representation dated 08.12.2022 of the petitioners. The recommendations/decision of the said Board are as under:
"The issue has been examined by the Board in the light of communication/updates provided by the Organi
Judicial intervention is warranted when there is undue delay in responding to representations made by citizens, affirming the right to timely administrative action.
The court affirmed the necessity for procedural fairness in administrative decision-making, particularly in response to representations regarding recruitment vacancies.
The court emphasized the importance of timely consideration and communication of decisions regarding the benefits of a judgment.
Misuse of judicial process through filing repeated applications and writ petitions is not permissible.
The court emphasized the importance of timely adjudication of representations under Article 226 and issued a writ of mandamus to ensure the same.
The court emphasized the importance of timely decision-making in the context of Cadre Review for Tradesman Cadre and directed the respondents to adhere to specific timelines for the decision and appr....
The court upheld the dismissal of the petitioner under the CRPF Act, affirming the authority's findings and directing compliance with procedural requirements for consequential orders.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
