SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Del) 889

MANOJ KUMAR OHRI
Anupam Gulati – Appellant
Versus
Manoj Gupta – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Mr. D.C. Tripathi, Advocate, for the Appellant.
Mr. Daksh Nain, Advocate for Respondent No.1.

JUDGMENT

Manoj Kumar Ohri, J.

1. By way of present appeal filed under Section 30 of the Employees' Compensation Act, 1923 (hereinafter, referred to as the 'EC Act'), the appellant (proprietor of M/s Nirala Promoters and Developers) has assailed order dated 23.10.2017 passed in Case No.CWC- I/WD/20/2015/618-619 and rectified on 05.03.2018 by learned Commissioner, Employees' Compensation, District West, Delhi, whereby claim petition filed by respondent No.1 was allowed.

2. The facts, in nutshell, are that respondent No.1/claimant claimed to be in employment of M/s Nirala Promoters and Developers as a Pizza Delivery Boy on bike bearing registration No. DL-9-SAA-8014, since 6 months preceding the filing of the claim petition. On 30.10.2014, while he was going on the aforesaid bike at about 07:20 pm to deliver a cake from "Slice of Italy" to a flat in Connaught Place, a car came from behind and hit him, leading to a fracture in his right leg.

It was claimed that as a result of the accident, respondent No.1 had become 100% disabled for the purpose of employment as a Pizza Delivery Boy. His last drawn wages were stated to be Rs.9,000/- per month. It was further claimed that the bike was i

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top