SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Del) 1632

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Prathiba M. Singh, J.
Akshat Baldwa & Ors. – Appellants
Versus
Yash Raj Films & Ors. – Respondents
W.P.(C) 445 of 2023 and CM Appls. 1752 of 2023, 16398 of 2023
Decided On : 06-04-2023

Advocates appeared:
Mr. Aditya Gupta and Mr. Rahul Bajaj, Advocates, for the Petitioner.
Mr. Abhishek Malhotra, Ms. Sapna Chaurasia, Mr. Harsh Buch, Ms. Srishti Gupta and Ms. Shilpa Gamnani, Advocates, for the Respondent-1.
Mr. Chetan Sharma, ASG with Mr. Ravi Prakash, CGSC, Mr. Farman Ali, M. Aman Rewaria, Ms. Usha Jamnal & Ms. Astu Khandelwal, Advocates, for the Respondent-2, 2A & 3.
Ms. Sneha Jain, Mr. Devvrat Joshi, and Mr. Angad S Makkar, Advocates, for the Respondent-4.
Mr. Nitin Sharma, Ms. Deepika Pokharia and Mr. Kuber Mahajan, Advocates, for the Respondent-5.
Mr. Kunnal, Advocate, for the Respondent.
Mr. Pranay Sarthi Advocate, for the Respondent-6.

The central legal point established in the judgment is the obligation of the government and private parties to provide reasonable accommodation and enforce accessibility as a legal right for persons with disabilities.

Headnote:

Accessibility - Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016 - Section 42, Rule 15 - The court considered the provisions of the RPWD Act, 2016 and issued interim directions to ensure accessibility features such as audio description, subtitling, and closed captions for visually and hearing impaired persons in the film 'Pathaan'. The court emphasized the obligation of the government and private parties to provide reasonable accommodation and enforce accessibility as a legal right. It directed stakeholder consultation to implement the Act and circular on accessibility standards for films and entertainment.

Fact of the Case:

The petitioners sought reliefs for accessibility features in the film 'Pathaan' for visually and hearing impaired persons. The court considered the provisions of the RPWD Act, 2016 and issued interim directions to ensure accessibility features in the film and directed stakeholder consultation for implementation.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that accessibility for persons with disabilities is crucial and enforceable as a legal right. It emphasized the obligation of the government and private parties to provide reasonable accommodation and enforce accessibility. The court issued interim directions to ensure accessibility features in the film 'Pathaan' and directed stakeholder consultation for implementation.

Issues: The issues involved the accessibility of entertainment for visually and hearing impaired persons, the obligation of the government and private parties to provide reasonable accommodation, and the implementation of accessibility standards for films and entertainment.

Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized the obligation of the government and private parties to provide reasonable accommodation and enforce accessibility as a legal right. It issued interim directions to ensure accessibility features in the film 'Pathaan' and directed stakeholder consultation for implementation.

Final Decision: The court directed stakeholder consultation to implement the provisions of the RPWD Act, 2016 and the circular on accessibility standards for films and entertainment. The matter was listed for further hearing.

JUDGMENT

Prathiba M. Singh, J. (Oral)--This hearing has been done through hybrid mode.

2. The present petition has been preferred by four Petitioners, out of whom, Petitioner Nos. 1, 2 and 4 are visually impaired and Petitioner No.3 is hearing impaired. The Petitioners had filed the present writ petition seeking reliefs in respect of the feature film `Pathaan' and praying for directions to incorporate sub-titling (same language), sub-titling (otherwise), captioning and audio-description for the movie `Pathaan'. In addition, one of the prayers is for notification of the standards of accessibility to be implemented in films in order to make film viewing enjoyable for visually and hearing impaired persons.

3. The Respondents who were impleaded were the producer of the film Yash Raj Films, two Ministries i.e. Ministry of Information & Broadcasting and Ministry of Social Justice & Empowerment, Department of Empowerment of Persons with Disabilities and Amazon Sellers Services Private Ltd.

4. The petition was listed on 16th January, 2023 on which date, this Court had considered the submissions made on behalf of the Petitioners as also the Respondents. The provisions of the Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016 (hereinafter `RPWD Act, 2016') were also considered. The Court had thereafter directed as under:

    "12. Heard. This Court is of the opinion that the present petition raises very important issues as to the accessibility to various modes of entertainment for the hearing and visually impaired persons. A reading of Section 42 of the RPWD Act, 2016 shows that the Government has an obligation to take measures to ensure that all content is available in formats accessible to persons with disabilities. The said provision is set out below:

    "42. Access to information and communication technology.-The appropriate Government shall take measures to ensure that,-

    (i) all contents available in audio, print and electronic media are in accessible format;

    (ii) persons with disabilities have access to electronic media by providing audio description, sign language interpretation and close captioning;

    (iii) electronic goods and equipment which are meant for every day use are available in universal design."

    13. In the context of films, the measures that can be taken by film producers to make them accessible to the hearing and visually impaired persons, are as under:

  • Audio description-which implies the verbal depiction of key visual elements in media and live productions. This involves description of the visuals on screen to enable imagination by the hearing impaired;
  • Subtitling-which provides a text alternative for the dialogue of video footage-the spoken words of characters, narrators and other vocal participants, in the original language itself, as also, in the dubbed language in case of dubbed movies; and
  • Closed Captions-which not only supplement dialogue but other relevant parts of the soundtrack - describing background noises, phones ringing, and other audio cues that need describing,

    These features would be integral to the enjoyment of films for persons with disabilities.

    14. In view of the above, special measures would have to be taken for the hearing and visually impaired persons, inasmuch as the experience of watching a film in a movie theatre cannot be denied to persons with disabilities. This is particularly true in view of the fact that the technology for the same is readily available. As submitted by Mr. Bajaj, several films in the past, such as Dangal, Black, Munna Bhai MBBS, are stated to have incorporated audio descriptions, subtitles and closed captions for the hearing and visually impaired persons.

    15. Thus, considering the reliefs sought, there are two aspects that would be required to be considered:

    i. Firstly, directions insofar as the film `Pathaan' is concerned, to make the said film comply with the prescribed accessibility standards, to the extent possible; and

    ii. Secondly, an overall solution that has to be found to ensure the

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top