IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Prathiba M. Singh, J.
Akshat Baldwa & Ors. – Appellants
Versus
Yash Raj Films & Ors. – Respondents
W.P.(C) 445 of 2023 and CM Appls. 1752 of 2023, 16398 of 2023
Decided On : 06-04-2023
Accessibility - Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016 - Section 42, Rule 15 - The court considered the provisions of the RPWD Act, 2016 and issued interim directions to ensure accessibility features such as audio description, subtitling, and closed captions for visually and hearing impaired persons in the film 'Pathaan'. The court emphasized the obligation of the government and private parties to provide reasonable accommodation and enforce accessibility as a legal right. It directed stakeholder consultation to implement the Act and circular on accessibility standards for films and entertainment.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioners sought reliefs for accessibility features in the film 'Pathaan' for visually and hearing impaired persons. The court considered the provisions of the RPWD Act, 2016 and issued interim directions to ensure accessibility features in the film and directed stakeholder consultation for implementation.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that accessibility for persons with disabilities is crucial and enforceable as a legal right. It emphasized the obligation of the government and private parties to provide reasonable accommodation and enforce accessibility. The court issued interim directions to ensure accessibility features in the film 'Pathaan' and directed stakeholder consultation for implementation.
Issues: The issues involved the accessibility of entertainment for visually and hearing impaired persons, the obligation of the government and private parties to provide reasonable accommodation, and the implementation of accessibility standards for films and entertainment.
Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized the obligation of the government and private parties to provide reasonable accommodation and enforce accessibility as a legal right. It issued interim directions to ensure accessibility features in the film 'Pathaan' and directed stakeholder consultation for implementation.
Final Decision: The court directed stakeholder consultation to implement the provisions of the RPWD Act, 2016 and the circular on accessibility standards for films and entertainment. The matter was listed for further hearing.
JUDGMENT
Prathiba M. Singh, J. (Oral)--This hearing has been done through hybrid mode.
2. The present petition has been preferred by four Petitioners, out of whom, Petitioner Nos. 1, 2 and 4 are visually impaired and Petitioner No.3 is hearing impaired. The Petitioners had filed the present writ petition seeking reliefs in respect of the feature film `Pathaan' and praying for directions to incorporate sub-titling (same language), sub-titling (otherwise), captioning and audio-description for the movie `Pathaan'. In addition, one of the prayers is for notification of the standards of accessibility to be implemented in films in order to make film viewing enjoyable for visually and hearing impaired persons.
3. The Respondents who were impleaded were the producer of the film Yash Raj Films, two Ministries i.e. Ministry of Information & Broadcasting and Ministry of Social Justice & Empowerment, Department of Empowerment of Persons with Disabilities and Amazon Sellers Services Private Ltd.
4. The petition was listed on 16th January, 2023 on which date, this Court had considered the submissions made on behalf of the Petitioners as also the Respondents. The provisions of the Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016 (hereinafter `RPWD Act, 2016') were also considered. The Court had thereafter directed as under:
"12. Heard. This Court is of the opinion that the present petition raises very important issues as to the accessibility to various modes of entertainment for the hearing and visually impaired persons. A reading of Section 42 of the RPWD Act, 2016 shows that the Government has an obligation to take measures to ensure that all content is available in formats accessible to persons with disabilities. The said provision is set out below:
"42. Access to information and communication technology.-The appropriate Government shall take measures to ensure that,-
(i) all contents available in audio, print and electronic media are in accessible format;
(ii) persons with disabilities have access to electronic media by providing audio description, sign language interpretation and close captioning;
(iii) electronic goods and equipment which are meant for every day use are available in universal design."
13. In the context of films, the measures that can be taken by film producers to make them accessible to the hearing and visually impaired persons, are as under:
These features would be integral to the enjoyment of films for persons with disabilities.
14. In view of the above, special measures would have to be taken for the hearing and visually impaired persons, inasmuch as the experience of watching a film in a movie theatre cannot be denied to persons with disabilities. This is particularly true in view of the fact that the technology for the same is readily available. As submitted by Mr. Bajaj, several films in the past, such as Dangal, Black, Munna Bhai MBBS, are stated to have incorporated audio descriptions, subtitles and closed captions for the hearing and visually impaired persons.
15. Thus, considering the reliefs sought, there are two aspects that would be required to be considered:
i. Firstly, directions insofar as the film `Pathaan' is concerned, to make the said film comply with the prescribed accessibility standards, to the extent possible; and
ii. Secondly, an overall solution that has to be found to ensure the
Accessibility features must be mandated in film screenings for persons with disabilities, ensuring universal access as per relevant legislation.
The court affirmed that the right to accessibility for persons with disabilities is a fundamental right under Article 21, mandating the state to ensure operational audio announcement systems in publi....
The judgment emphasizes the creative freedom of filmmakers in addressing social issues and the responsibility to depict the overall message of the film in determining its permissibility. It also high....
Derogatory portrayal of persons with disabilities in movie – As long as overall message of film justifies depiction of disparaging language being used against persons with disabilities, it cannot be ....
The judgment mandates the delineation of enforceable accessibility rules under the RPWD Act, emphasizing that existing guidelines are insufficient for ensuring compliance and equal access for persons....
Point of Law : Once film is granted certificate by competent statutory authority, i.e. Board, producer or distributor of the film has every right to exhibit film in a hall unless, of course, said cer....
The Court held that the Revising Committee is required to assign reasons while granting 'U' certificate to a film with excisions and that no reasons were assigned by the Revising Committee in this ca....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.