SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(SC) 1011

D. Y. CHANDRACHUD, J. B. PARDIWALA, MANOJ MISRA
Rajive Raturi – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent


JUDGMENT :

Dr Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, CJI

A.

Background

i. Genesis of the proceedings

ii. Assignment to NALSAR-CDS

B.

Understanding Accessibility

i. International Framework on Accessibility

ii. Accessibility as a Human Right

iii. Accessibility Jurisprudence

C.

Reaffirming Disability as a Social Model: Two-Pronged Approach

i. Integrating a Universal and Inclusive Model of Design

ii. A two-pronged approach to accessibility

iii. Reasonable Accommodation and Accessibility

D.

NALSAR Report and its findings: Sector Wise

E.

Inconsistencies in the Existing Legal Framework

i. Accessibility provisions in the RPWD Act and Rules

ii. Inconsistency between Rule 15 and the RPWD Act

F.

Conclusion

    "Disability only becomes a tragedy when society fails to provide the things we need to lead our lives – job opportunities or barrier-free buildings. It is not a tragedy to me that I'm living in a wheelchair."

    - Judith Heumann

1. This judgment arises from a Writ Petition instituted in 2005 seeking directions to ensure meaningful access to public spaces for persons with disabilities1[“PWDs”]. On 15 December 2017

    Click Here to Read the rest of this document
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10
    11
    SupremeToday Portrait Ad
    supreme today icon
    logo-black

    An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

    Please visit our Training & Support
    Center or Contact Us for assistance

    qr

    Scan Me!

    India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

    For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

    whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
    whatsapp-icon Back to top