IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Swarana Kanta Sharma, J.
Marryamma @ Maryamal – Appellant
Versus
Shri Mani – Respondent
Crl.Rev.P. 666 of 2018
Decided On : 06-04-2023
Maintenance - Section 125 of Cr.P.C. - Section 127 of Cr.P.C. - [ALTERATION IN ALLOWANCE] - [SPOUSAL MAINTENANCE] - [Section 127 of Cr.P.C.] - [Section 125 of Cr.P.C.]
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner sought enhancement of maintenance from Rs.400/- to Rs.5,000/- per month, citing the increased income of the respondent and her own unemployment. The respondent argued that the petitioner had concealed her income and that he had been regularly paying the maintenance. The Family Court enhanced the maintenance to Rs.5,000/- per month, which was challenged by the petitioner.
Finding of the Court:
The Court found that the petitioner was earning a meager amount from daily wages and was dependent on the respondent for day-to-day expenses. It held that the respondent had means of income and no other liability except to maintain his wife. The Court emphasized the legal and moral duty of the husband to maintain his wife according to his means and capacity.
Issues: The main issue was the enhancement of maintenance under Section 125 of Cr.P.C. and the interpretation of the husband's duty to maintain his wife.
Ratio Decidendi: The Court relied on the provisions of Section 127 of Cr.P.C. and emphasized the wife's entitlement to maintenance equal to the status and stature of her husband. It also considered the husband's means of income and his duty to maintain his wife according to his capacity.
Final Decision: The Court remanded the case to the Family Court for deciding the issue of enhanced maintenance afresh, directing the respondent to pay Rs.10,000/- per month to the petitioner until the matter regarding interim maintenance was disposed of by the Family Court.
JUDGMENT
Swarana Kanta Sharma, J. By way of present petition filed under Section 401 read with Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (`Cr.P.C.'), the petitioner assails the order dated 05.05.2018 passed by learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Patiala House Court, New Delhi (`Family Court') in M.No.101/2016, whereby the amount of maintenance was enhanced and the respondent was directed to pay a sum of Rs.5,000/- per month as maintenance to the petitioner.
2. The relevant facts, leading to the filing of present petition are that the marriage between the parties was solemnized in the year 1985. After differences having arisen between the parties, the petitioner had filed a petition for grant of maintenance under Section 125 of Cr.P.C. and vide order dated 31.08.1999, the respondent had been directed to pay a sum of Rs.400/- per month to the petitioner and Rs.300/- each to the three children born from the wedlock. The income of the respondent at the relevant time in the year 1999 had been assessed as Rs.3,000/- per month. The petitioner, in the year 2016, had preferred a petition under Section 127 Cr.P.C. before the learned Family Court on the ground that she was unemployed and unable to maintain herself, and that the salary of respondent had increased manifold over the years 2005-06, 2006-07 and 2007-08. She had stated that respondent had not paid her any amount and despite having sufficient means, had refused and neglected to maintain her. It was also the case of petitioner that respondent had no other liability but to maintain himself and her according to his status. She had also stated that respondent was a government employee, working in NDMC Palika Kendra, Sansad Marg and his monthly salary was Rs.37,549/- as per his salary slip for the month of November, 2015. The petitioner had prayed for grant of Rs.25,000/- per month as maintenance and Rs.55,000/- as litigation expenses by way of her application under Section 127 of Cr.P.C. for enhancement of maintenance before the learned Family Court.
3. In reply to the application filed by the petitioner before the learned Family Court, the respondent had stated that petitioner had left the matrimonial home out of her own free will and without any reason. He also stated that the petitioner had concealed her income that she was earning by housekeeping work. He also stated that he had been getting only about Rs.20,000/- as salary after reasonable deductions and that he was regularly paying Rs.400/- per month as per order dated 31.08.1999 passed by learned Metropolitan Magistrate, Patiala House Court, Delhi. He also pleaded that he had on many occasions deposited handsome amount in the bank account of the petitioner. It was stated that he was working as a labourer and therefore, petition was prayed to be dismissed.
4. After considering and examining the case of both the parties, learned Family Court passed the order dated 05.05.2018 which has been impugned before this Court. The operative portion of the said order reads as under:
"13. In the present case, the petitioner in her detailed income, assets and expenditure affidavit stated that her date of marriage as year 1985 and date of separation as year 1998. She has shown her educational, professional qualification and occupation as Nil. She has also shown her monthly income as Nil. In para No. 28 of part-II of her affidavit she has mentioned Rs.50,000/- pm approximately as income of her spouse. In part-V of her affidavit, she has mentioned household expenditure as Rs.25000/- and Rs.500/- pm on telephone/mobile. In Part-VIII of her income affidavit, she has mentioned expenditure ordinarily incurred on family functions including birthday of the children as Rs.1000/-, expenditure ordinarily incurred on festivals as Rs.2000/- and expenditure incurred on marriage of family members as Rs.1000/-.
14. The respondent in his detailed income, assets and expenditure affidavit stated his date of marriage in the year 1982-83 and date o
The main legal point established in the judgment is the husband's legal and moral duty to maintain his wife according to his means and capacity, as well as the entitlement of the wife to maintenance ....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the quantum of maintenance must be determined based on the financial status of the parties, the reasonable needs of the dependant spouse and c....
The court emphasized the importance of considering only mandatory deductions and compulsory contributions while determining the amount of maintenance, ensuring that the wife can live in reasonable co....
Enhancement of maintenance must align with the changing income and circumstances of the parties, recognizing the financial dependency of a spouse irrespective of their qualifications and parental sup....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the entitlement of a wife to maintenance equal to the status and stature of her husband, the obligation of the husband to maintain the wife, and th....
The court determined that maintenance must reflect current living standards and factual scenarios, affirming that financial obligations adjust with changing circumstances.
Quantum of maintenance – Enquiry under Section 127 of Cr.P.C. must extend to changes in financial conditions of parties.
Voluntary loan repayments and personal debts cannot be treated as necessary deductions to reduce a spouse’s maintenance liability, and maintenance cannot be denied or reduced based on speculative con....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.