IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Suresh Kumar Kait, Neena Bansal Krishna, JJ.
Wg Cdr C Padmanabhan (retd.), Commandant Pilot, Bsf – Appellant
Versus
Commandant (Personnel), Border Securtiy Force & Ors. – Respondents
W.P.(C) 1666 of 2015
Decided On : 12-04-2023
Promotion - Eligibility Criteria - Medical Fitness Test - Residency Period - [PROMOTION] - [INDIAN AIR FORCE OFFICER] - [RR dated 11.11.2011] - The court discussed the petitioner's eligibility for promotion to the rank of Deputy Inspector General (DIG) in the Border Security Force (BSF) and the waiver of residency period. The court also highlighted the mala fide intention of the respondents in subjecting the petitioner to multiple medical tests and the relaxation of recruitment rules for another candidate. The court found that the petitioner met the eligibility criteria for promotion and directed the respondents to promote the petitioner against the vacancy for the year 2013-14.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner, an Indian Air Force Officer, sought promotion to the rank of Deputy Inspector General (DIG) in the Border Security Force (BSF) but faced challenges regarding the residency period and medical fitness tests. The petitioner alleged mala fide intentions by the respondents and sought relief from the court.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the petitioner met the eligibility criteria for promotion and was subjected to unfair treatment by the respondents in the form of unnecessary medical tests and relaxation of recruitment rules for another candidate. The court also noted that the petitioner had been promoted to the post of DIG against the vacancy for the year 2018 during the pendency of the petition.
Issues: The issues revolved around the petitioner's eligibility for promotion, waiver of residency period, mala fide intentions of the respondents, and unfair treatment in the form of multiple medical tests and relaxation of recruitment rules for another candidate.
Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the petitioner met the eligibility criteria for promotion, and the respondents' actions were mala fide and unfair. The court also emphasized the importance of upholding recruitment rules and fair treatment in promotion processes.
Final Decision: The court allowed the petition and directed the respondents to promote the petitioner against the vacancy for the year 2013-14, refix his seniority, and grant consequential financial benefits within four weeks.
JUDGMENT
Suresh Kumar Kait, J.
1. The petitioner had joined the Indian Air Force as a Commissioned Officer in the Flying Branch on 06.12.1986 as an Ex Indian Air Force Officer (Helicopter Pilot). He had joined the Border Security Force ('BSF') initially on deputation as Commandant/ Co-Pilot on 06.10.2008 and subsequently appointed as a Commandant Pilot in BSF in Feeder Cadre, subject to his relieving from Indian Air Force. The petitioner, after his relieving from Indian Air Force w.e.f. 30.01.2011, assumed charge in BSF on 31.01.2011.
2. The petitioner claims to have become eligible to the rank of Deputy Inspector General (DIG) on 01.01.2013, subject to his fulfilling requisite conditions under Recruitment Rules (RR) dated 11.11.2011 issued by the Central Government. The petitioner further claims to be fulfilling the requisite conditions as per RR except the condition of 2 years "residency" clause, falling short of 30 days as on date of consideration i.e. 01.01 2013. The petitioner applied for waiver of the said condition vide his representation dated 21.11.2012 in terms of Clause- 10 of RR dated 11.11.2011 which provided for relaxation of any of the provisions of these Rules with respect to any class or category of persons. Having received no response, petitioner made another request to the BSF authorities vide representation dated 01.03.2013 seeking waiver of condition of two years. of residency.
3. According to petitioner, four vacancies for the post of DIG were available for the year 2013-14, however, Departmental Promotion Committee ('DPC') was not constituted till December, 2013. Subsequent upon issuance of an open advertisement dated 07.02.2013 by the BSF for the post of Senior Operations Officer - DIG, the petitioner finding himself fit applied for the same and alternatively waited for convening of DPC for the year 2013-14 and also waiver of this deficient residency period. A similar advertisement dated 20.09.2014 was published by the BSF for the same post of Senior Operations Officer-DIG, however, the conditions for the said post were changed, which according to petitioner was in violation of Recruitment Rules and had been done to accommodate Air Commandant Sanjay Sharma (Retd.), who was appointed as Senior Operations Officer-DIG in October, 2014. The petitioner was granted waiver of 30 days. "residency" on 09.01.2014 and after a lapse of more than one year, the DPC was convened on 20.02.2014, wherein petitioner was empanelled for promotion to the post of DIG. However, on 18.02.2014, around the time of first death anniversary of petitioner's daughter, aged 14 years, he got emotionally stressed and fell into a state of semi consciousness and was rushed to Moolchand Khairatiram Hospital at Lajpat Nagar by his wife. Thereafter, the petitioner was referred to Army R & R Hospital and was discharged on 24.02.2014. However, the discharge note of the Army R & R Hospital stated "Seizure Disorder, Type 2 DM, with HTN dyslipidemia", whereas no such remark was given by the doctors at Moolchand Khairatiram Hospital.
4. Even though as per RR dated 11.11.2011 there was no requirement of any medical fitness/test as eligibility criteria, especially in case of promotion from Commandant to DIG, however, 0n 03.03.2014 petitioner was verbally asked to report to FHQ hospital before a Medical Board for his promotion to the DIG rank. The Medical Board presided over by CMO (SG), FHQ HOSPITAL from 03.03.2014 to 25.04.2014 declared him Shape-1, which was approved by IG Medical on 29.04.2014. However, thereafter, on 08.07.2014, petitioner was again asked to report FHQ Hospital - 1, BSF before a fresh Medical Board; which he was informed was based upon his treatment from 18 to 24.02.2014. Despite the fact it was less than three months to the previous Medical Board, which was valid for a period of one year as per para 5.3.6 of IAP 4303, which regulates procedure for Medical Examinations for the Air Crew Flying Military registered Air Craft,
The main legal point established in the judgment is the importance of upholding eligibility criteria for promotion, fair treatment in promotion processes, and adherence to recruitment rules.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that while the fitness of armed forces personnel is of prime importance, the punishment imposed should be proportionate to the circumstances, and i....
The petitioner is entitled to seniority from the date his juniors were promoted, as administrative delays in conducting the Medical Board should not penalize him.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the applicability of the Circular dated 28.05.2013 to the petitioner's recruitment and subsequent termination based on 'Defective Colour Vision'. T....
The main legal point established is the court's discretion to consider leniency in cases of termination on medical grounds and to direct the petitioner to be treated as 'compulsorily retired from ser....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that 'displeasure' is not a penalty enlisted in Rule 11 of the CCS (CCA) Rules, 1965, and cannot be used to deny promotion.
The court upheld that the appointment of the petitioner to an alternative post was lawful despite previous findings of unfitness, affirming the requirement to comply with procedural norms for medical....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.