SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Jhk) 165

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI 
DEEPAK ROSHAN, J.
Sri Badri Narayan Pandey, S/o. Sri Ram Kailash Pandey – Petitioner
Versus
The Union of India through the General Manager – Respondent 
W.P.(S) No. 3684 of 2
Decided On : 02-04-2026

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioners: Mr. Sakaldeo Singh, Adv Mr. Rabindra Prasad, Adv.
For the Respondents: Ms. Leena Mukherjee, C.G.C.

The court upheld that the appointment of the petitioner to an alternative post was lawful despite previous findings of unfitness, affirming the requirement to comply with procedural norms for medical evaluations.

Headnote:(A) Persons with Disabilities (Equal Opportunities, Protection of Rights and Full Participation) Act, 1995 - Indian Railway Establishment Manual, Chapter XIII, Para 1304 - Appointment and fitness issues - Petitioner, previously unfit, was appointed to Tech 1/Power House post after medical evaluation that contradicted prior finding of unfitness - Court found appointment in accordance with law as there was no appeal against fitness certificate. (Paras 14, 24)

(B) Medical Examination and Recommendations - The petitioner was not re-examined for fitness as previously recommended; claims of requiring another medical evaluation rejected due to petitioner's non-compliance with procedures. (Paras 5, 26)

Facts of the case:
The petitioner, an Assistant Sub-Inspector, sought relief after being declared unfit for his post following a major accident. Medical evaluations and recommendations by committees led to disagreements over his fitness for alternative roles, resulting in his application for voluntary retirement linked to a condition for his son's employment.

Findings of Court:
The Court held that the appointment to an alternative position was lawful and that the rejection of the petitioner's voluntary retirement application was justifiable based on his failure to report to the new post.

Issues: Whether the petitioner’s appointment to the alternative post was lawful, and if his request for voluntary retirement was properly managed considering his non-joining of the assigned post.

Ratio Decidendi: The court concluded that once medically decategorized, it was the respondent's duty to provide an appropriate post, and the petitioner’s refusal to accept the movement order constituted a failure that affected his claims and requests for retirement.

Result: Writ petition dismissed.

Table of Content
1. petitioner's arguments regarding medical fitness and appeals. (Para 2 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 10)
2. factual background regarding petitioner's employment and injury. (Para 3 , 4)
3. respondents' denial of petitioner's claims and rebuttal. (Para 8 , 9 , 11)
4. legal issues framed regarding appointment and voluntary retirement. (Para 13 , 14 , 20)
5. court's observations on respondent's adherence to rules and petitioner's conduct. (Para 19 , 22 , 24)
6. conclusion: writ petition dismissed. (Para 26)

JUDGMENT :

DEEPAK ROSHAN, J.

1. Heard learned counsel for the parties.

2. The relief sought by the petitioner is reproduced as under:-

(i) That through the instant writ application, the petitioner prays for the issuance of an appropriate writ(s)/order(s)/direction(s) or a writ in the nature of Mandamus, Commanding and directing upon the respondents, Particularly the respondent no.6 i.e. Chief Medical Superintendent, East -Central Railway Dhanbad to arrange the Constitution of Medical Board, by himself and if it is not within his competency, then by the Respondent no.4 i.e. Principal Chief Medical Director, East Central Railway, Hajipur by moving the matter before him for remedial Examination of the petitioner to find out the unfitness or fitness of the petitioner in B2 and below Medical Categories of Job in Railway, as the petitioner was found not fit for any job even under B2 and below Medical Categories of the Posts by the three members Screening Committee, Comprising of Senior Divisional Medical Officer, Surgery /East- Central Railway, Dhanbad, Commanding Officer, 10BN/RPSF/East-Central Railway, Dhanbad and Senior Divisional Personnel Officer, East-Central Railway, Dhanbad during Conduction of a Screening test of the petitioner on 7/3/19 and accordingly the screening Committee vide recommendation dated 7/3/2019 over the screening Sheet called for and demanded re-medical examination of the petitioner on non fitness of the petitioner for B2 and below Medical category of the post and on the basis of the same recommendation dated 7/3/19 of the screening Committee having approval of Divisional Railway Manager , ECR, DHN ,the Senior Divisional Personnel Officer , East Central Railway Communicated the said recommendation to the Chief Medical Superintendent, East-Central Railway, Dhanbad (Respondent No-6) , Vide his letter no E/MED/DECATG/ABSORPTION/ 18 dt 18.3.19 (Annexure-2 Series) demanding Constitution of Medical Board by the Medical Department of the Railway for remedical Examination of the petitioner on the unfitness or fitness for the Job which was neglected by the Chief Medical Superintendent , ECR, Dhanbad in violation of Railway Rules and in violation of the letter dated 18/3/2019 of the Sr DPO/ECR/DHN (Respondent-7) in a most unreasonable and illegal way.

(ii) Further prays for the issuance of an appropriate writ(s)/order(s)/direction(s) or a writ in the nature of certiorari for quashing of the unreasonable and unwanted instructions as contained in the letter no. H/Conf/ MBD/BNP/19 dt 26/7/2019 by CMS/ECR/DHN to Adjutant (Annexure-9) with copy to PCMD/ECR/HJP and Sr DPO/ ECR/DHN that the information has been given on 27/4/2019 for submission of appeal for remedical examination of the petitioner to PCMD/ECR/HJP through the department as when the recommendation of the Screening Committee dated 7/3/19 had already been Communicated to the CMS/ECR/DHN vide Senior DPO/ECR/DHN'S letter dated 18/3/19 for arranging Constitution of Medical Board for remedical Examination of the petitioner on the fitness or unfitness in B2 and below post, it was not at all desirable on the part of CMS/ECR/DHN to inform on 27/4/19 to RPSF Department or to Sr DPO/ECR/DHN for making appeal unwantedly ,out of way in belated stage as it was the duty of the CMS/ECR/DHN to write to PCMD/ECR/HJP for constitution of Medical Board for Remedical examination of the petitioner in Consonance to the letter dated 18/3/19 of the SR DPO /ECR/DHN which was neglected unreasona

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top