SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Del) 1282

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
C. Hari Shankar, J.
PT Djarum – Appellant
Versus
Bajrang Traders & Anr. – Respondents
CS (COMM) 593 of 2022 & I.A. 13715 of 2022
Decided On : 25-04-2023

Advocates appeared:
Mr. Mukul Kochhar, Advocate, for the Plaintiff.
Ms. Noopur Biswas, Advocate, for the Defendant.

Enforceability of settlement agreements in resolving disputes.

Headnote:

Settlement Agreement - Trademark Dispute - Not Applicable - The court found that the settlement agreement between the parties was lawful and decreed the suit in terms of the settlement agreement.

Fact of the Case:

The dispute between the parties was settled with the intervention of the Delhi High Court Mediation and Conciliation Centre. A settlement agreement was reached, and the court found the terms of settlement to be lawful, decreeing the suit in terms of the settlement agreement.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the settlement agreement was lawful and decreed the suit in terms of the settlement agreement.

Issues: The main issue was the settlement of the dispute between the parties and the lawfulness of the settlement agreement.

Ratio Decidendi: The court's decision was based on the lawfulness of the settlement agreement and the absence of any remaining dispute for adjudication.

Final Decision: The suit was decreed in terms of the settlement agreement, and the parties were bound by the terms and conditions contained therein.

ORDER (Oral)

1. The dispute between the parties stands settled with the intervention of the Delhi High Court Mediation and Conciliation Centre.

2. A report from the Mediation and Conciliation Centre along with Settlement Agreement dated 6th April 2023 has been received. The terms of settlement read thus:

    "A. The Second Party acknowledges that the First Party is the registered proprietor of the well-known DJARUM BLACK Trademarks as well as the DJARUM BLACK Logo.

    B. The Second Party has, in recognition of the First Party's rights in the DJARUM BLACK Trademarks, ceased all use of the trade marks [IMG], and [IMG] and undertakes to not use, directly or indirectly, the said marks and/or any other mark identical or deceptively similar to the First Party's DJARUM BLACK Trademarks and/or the DJARUM BLACK Logo in future and/or directly or indirectly make any trade mark or copyright application in future in relation to any mark which is identical or deceptively similar to the First Party's DJARUM BLACK Trademarks and/or the DJARUM BLACK Logo.

    C. The Second Party undertakes and warrants that no other person or party is using the trade marks [IMG], [IMG] and [IMG] or similar copyright logo for/on behalf of under permission of the Second Party.

    D. The Second Party has disclosed the stock of products bearing the trade marks [IMG], [IMG] and [IMG] as on February 23, 2023 to the First Party. A detailed inventory of the stock of products bearing the aforementioned trademarks as on February 15, 2023 has been annexed hereto as ANNEXURE 'B'.

    E. The Second Party has agreed to destroy all the stock as disclosed in Annexure B and available in their possession, in the presence of the authorized representative appointed on behalf of the First Party, within ten (10) days of signing this Agreement on such date, time and venue as mutually agreed between the Parties and disclosed by the Second Party to the First Party. The representative of the First Party may record a video of such destruction of stock for his record.

    F. The Second Party confirms that it will within 15 (fifteen) days of signing the present Agreement make a public apology in the format enclosed as Annexure C in English and Hindi languages, in the following daily newspapers (i) Times of India and (ii) Navbharat Times, having national circulation. Copies of the public apology made by the Second Party in the aforementioned newspapers shall be forwarded to the legal representatives of the First Party within a maximum of two (2) from date of publication thereof.

    G. The Second Party confirms that it has already filed requests for withdrawal of the following trademarks bearing application numbers (i) 4756806 in class 34 for the mark [IMG], (ii) 5088002 in class 34 for the mark [IMG] (iii) 5051527 in class 34 for the mark [IMG] and (iv) 5088000 in class 34 for the mark [IMG]. The respective order of withdrawal/withdrawal requests for the aforementioned trade mark applications have been annexed hereto as ANNEXURE `D'.

    H. The Second Party further confirms that it has filed cancellation request for its copyright registration number 24548/2021-CO/A. A copy of the cancellation request/statement made to that effect to the Registrar of Copyright has been annexed hereto as ANNEXURE 'E'. The Second Party further confirms that it shall not in future, either directly or indirectly, apply for a copyright application in relation to any label/artistic work which is identical or substantially similar to the First Party's artistic work,

    I. The Second Party confirms that it shall not oppose or apply for cancellation of the First Party's DJARUM BLACK Trademarks or the DJARUM BLACK Logo at any point in time.

    J. The Second Party undertakes to not use in future the First Party's DJARUM BLACK Trademarks, the DJARUM BLACK Logo, the word "BLACK" or any other trade mark which is confusingly similar thereto in any manner, including but not limited to as a word mark, logo/device mark, domain name, company name, on social

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top