Back
C. HARI SHANKAR
Apnatime Tech Private Limited – Appellant
Versus
Apna Hr Consultancy – Respondent
ORDER (Oral)
1. Learned Counsel for the parties submits ad idem that the dispute in this present case stands settled by way of settlement agreement dated 27 April 2023 drawn up under the aegis of the Delhi High Court Mediation and Conciliation Centre, which is on record.
2. The terms of settlement read thus:
"1. The Defendants agree and undertake not to use either directly or indirectly the mark  and/or any other similar mark thereto before the Trademark Registry in respect of human resource consultancy and recruitment services, services related to training and educational and related services which would result in violation of the Plaintiffs' rights in the trademark APNA.</p></UL><UL><p align=)
2. The Defendants agree to cancel/withdraw its pending trademark application  days from the date of execution of this Settlement Agreement and provide proof of the same to the Plaintiffs.</p></UL><UL><p align=)
3. The Defendants agree and undertake to cease using and operating the domain name www.apnahr.in and transfer the same to the Plaintiffs without consideration within a period of 15 (fifteen) days from the date of signing this Settlement Agreement.
4. The Plaintiffs shall make an appropriate application for deletion of the name of Defendant No.1 from the array of parties on or before recording the terms of this Settlement Agreement before the Hon'ble Court.
5. In view of this Settlement Agreement, the Plaintiffs do not press for other monetary reliefs as claimed in the said Suit."
3. Learned Counsel for the parties agree, on behalf of their respective clients, to abide by the terms of settlement.
4. The Court has p
The court upheld the legality and regularity of the settlement agreement, leading to the decree in terms of the agreement.
Settlement agreements can be used to resolve disputes without delving into the merits of the case, and the court may decree the suit in terms of the settlement agreement.
Settlement agreements can effectively resolve disputes in trademark infringement cases, allowing parties to acknowledge rights and agree on actions to prevent future violations.
The court has the authority to examine and decree a suit based on the terms of settlement between the parties under Order XXIII Rule 3 of the CPC.
Mutual settlement of disputes allows parties to withdraw claims under Order XXIII Rule 3, leading to court decreeing the suit based on agreed terms.
Enforceability of settlement agreement under Order XXIII Rule 3 of the CPC.
A court may dispose of a civil suit in terms of a lawful settlement agreement arrived at between the parties under Order XXIII Rule 3 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, binding successors and assi....
The central legal point established in the judgment is the approval and enforcement of a Settlement Agreement to resolve trademark infringement disputes.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
